The Early Experience with a Laparoscopy-assisted Pylorus-preserving Gastrectomy: A Comparison with a Laparoscopy-assisted Distal Gastrectomy with Billroth-I Reconstruction.
10.5230/jkgca.2008.8.1.20
- Author:
Jong Ik PARK
1
;
Sung Ho JIN
;
Ho Yoon BANG
;
Gi Bong CHAE
;
Nam Sun PAIK
;
Nan Mo MOON
;
Jong Inn LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea. shjin@kcch.re.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG);
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction (LADGB I);
Early gastric cancer (EGC)
- MeSH:
Arteries;
Diet;
Female;
Flatulence;
Gastrectomy;
Gastroparesis;
Humans;
Korea;
Length of Stay;
Liver;
Lymph Node Excision;
Lymph Nodes;
Postgastrectomy Syndromes;
Postoperative Complications;
Seroma;
Sex Ratio;
Stomach;
Stomach Neoplasms;
Vagus Nerve
- From:Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
2008;8(1):20-26
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG), which retains pyloric ring and gastric function, has been accepted as a function-preserving procedure for early gastric cancer for the prevention of postgastrectomy syndrome. This study was compared laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preerving gastrectomy (LAPPG) with laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with Billroth-I reconstruction (LADGB I). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 2006 and September 2007, 39 patients with early gastric cancer underwent laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in the Department of Surgery at Korea Cancer Center Hospital. 9 of these patients underwent LAPPG and 18 underwent LADGBI. When LAPPG was underwent, we preserved the pyloric branch, hepatic branch, and celiac branch of the vagus nerve, the infrapyloric artery, and the right gastric artery and performed D1+beta lymphadenectomy to the exclusion of suprapyloric lymph node dissection. The distal stomach was resected while retaining a 2.5~3.0 cm pyloric cuff and maintaining a 3.0~4.0 cm distal margin for the resection. RESULTS: The mean age for patients who underwent LAPPG and LADGBI were 59.9+/-9.4 year-old and 64.1+/-10.0 year-old, respectively. The sex ratio was 1.3:1.0 (male 5, female 4) in the LAPPG group and 2.6:1.0 (male 13, female 5) in the LADGBI group. Mean total number of dissected lymph nodes (28.3+/-11.9 versus 28.1+/-8.9), operation time (269.0+/-34.4 versus 236.3+/-39.6 minutes), estimated blood loss (191.1+/-85.7 versus 218.3+/-150.6 ml), time to first flatus (3.6+/-0.9 versus 3.5+/-0.8 days), time to start of diet (5.1+/-0.9 versus 5.1+/-1.7 days), and postoperative hospital stay (10.1+/-4.0 versus 9.2+/-3.0 days) were not found significant differences (P>0.05). The postoperative complications were 1 patient with gastric stasis and 1 patient with wound seroma in LAPPG group and 1 patient with left lateral segment infarct of liver in the LADGB I group. CONCLUSION: Patients treated by LAPPG showed a comparable quality of surgical operation compared with those treated by LADGBI. LAPPG has an important role in the surgical management of early gastric cancer in terms of quality of postoperative life. Randomized controlled studies should be undertaken to analyze the optimal survival and long-term outcomes of this operative procedure.
