Association of biofilm production with colonization among clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii.
- Author:
Seong Yeol RYU
1
;
Won Ki BAEK
;
Hyun Ah KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Biofilms; Cross infection
- MeSH: Acinetobacter baumannii*; Acinetobacter*; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteria; Biofilms*; Colon*; Cross Infection; Daegu; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Korea; Patient Admission; Respiratory System; Sputum; Staphylococcus aureus; Virulence
- From:The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2017;32(2):345-351
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: The pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii is increasingly causing healthcare-associated infections worldwide, particularly in intensive care units. Biofilm formation, a factor contributing to the virulence of A. baumannii, is associated with long-term persistence in hospital environments. The present study investigates the clinical impact of biofilm production on colonization and acquisition after patient admission. METHODS: Forty-nine A. baumannii isolates were obtained between August and November 2013 from Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea. All isolates were obtained from sputum samples of new patients infected or colonized by A. baumannii. The microtiter plate assay was used to determine biofilm formation. RESULTS: Twenty-four A. baumannii isolates (48%) demonstrated enhanced biofilm formation capacity than that of the standard A. baumannii strain (ATCC 19606). All isolates were resistant to carbapenem, 38 isolates (77%) were collected from patients in an intensive care unit, and 47 isolates (95%) were from patients who had been exposed to antibiotics in the previous month. The median duration of colonization was longer for biofilm-producing isolates than that of the biofilm non-biofilm producing isolates (18 days vs. 12 days, p < 0.05). Simultaneous colonization with other bacteria was more common for biofilm-producing isolates than that for the non-biofilm producing isolates. The most prevalent co-colonizing bacteria was Staphylococcus aureus. CONCLUSIONS: Biofilm-producing isolates seem to colonize the respiratory tract for longer durations than the non-biofilm producing isolates. During colonization, biofilm producers promote co-colonization by other bacteria, particularly S. aureus. Additional research is required to determine possible links between biofilm formation and nosocomial infection.