Anatomical and tensile mechanical analysis of hip joint capsule repair in total hip replacement.
10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.08.015
- Author:
Han-Sheng HU
1
;
Jing-Cheng WANG
1
;
Zhi-Hua LU
1
;
Wei-Min FAN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Anatomy;
Arthroplasty, replacement, hip;
Biomechanics;
Capsule
- MeSH:
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip;
Biomechanical Phenomena;
Femur;
Hip Joint;
surgery;
Humans;
Joint Capsule;
surgery;
Tensile Strength
- From:
China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
2020;33(8):761-765
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To explore the tensile mechanics and anatomical characteristics of the posterior hip capsule, and provide biomechanical and anatomical evidence for capsule repair in total hip replacement.
METHODS:Six bone-capsule-bone specimens were obtained from posterior hip joint of fresh frozen cadavers. The maximum strain, load, elastic modulus and load strain curves of the capsule ligament complex specimens were recorded by Instron Universal Material Testing Machine. Twelve cadaveric hip specimens were dissected to the capsule. The tensile strain of normal capsule and conventionally reconstructed capsule at 90 degrees of hip flexion were documented. The suture area of the posterior capsule was divided into nine sections, and the thicknessof different sections was measured and compared. Posterior capsule of the cadavers was repaired in conventionally way and anatomical way separately and simulated rehabilitation was conducted. The effect of rehabilitation on the repaired capsule was observed.
RESULTS:The load-strain curve of capsule ligament complex conforms to rheological and viscoelastic characteristics. The maximum tensile strain of the complex was (39.21±5.23)%, the maximum load was (142.06± 34.15) N, the tensile strength was (1.65±0.38) MPa, and the elastic modulus is (14.23±5.62) MPa. At 90 ° hip flexion, the tensile strain of repaired capsule was higher than that of normal capsule, and the difference was statistically significant (< 0.05). Tensile strain of conventionally reconstructed capsule is:upper part (37.0±4.9)%, middle part ( 53.3±1.1)%, lower part (68.3±6.2)%, tensile strain of normal capsule is:upper part (17.0±2.6)%, middle part (24.1±1.4)%, lower part (26.0± 4.3)% . The thickness of the posterior joint capsulein different sections is statistically significant (<0.05), and capsule at 0.5cm proximal to the femoral insertion is suitable for suture. There the average thickness of capsule is:upper part (3.48 ± 0.11) mm, middle part (2.36 ± 0.09) mm, lower part (1. 59±0.24) mm. The posterior inferior joint capsule is thinnest at (1.42± 0.02) cm proximal to the femoral insertion, and sutures should be avoided here. After simulating rehabilitation, avulsion occurred in the lower part of the posterior capsule repaired conventionally (10/12), and the anatomically repaired capsule remained intact.
CONCLUSION:The lower part of conventionally repaired capsule is overstretched and tends to fail. Anatomically repaired capsule conforms to tensile mechanics and is helpful to reduce the failure rate of repair.
