Therapeutic effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2020.190517
- Author:
Huifang YIN
1
;
Fei ZENG
2
;
Min XUE
3
;
Xingbo TIAN
3
Author Information
1. Department of Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China. yinhuifang123456@163.com.
2. Department of Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China. 444838636@qq.com.
3. Department of Gynecology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
pelvic organ prolapse;
robot-assisted laparoscopy;
sacrocolpopexy
- MeSH:
Female;
Humans;
Laparoscopy;
Pelvic Organ Prolapse;
Quality of Life;
Retrospective Studies;
Robotics;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2020;45(6):709-714
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVES:To assess short-term functional outcomes achieved by robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
METHODS:We retrospectively collected clinical and operative data for female patients who underwent either pure laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (a control group, =20) or robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (a study group, =20) between December 2017 and December 2018. The clinical indicators included age, gestational age, parity, the stage of pelvic organ prolapse. Perioperative data included operative time and total blood loss. Post-operative outcomes included hospital stay, the time of detaining urethral catheterization, and the restart of anal exhaust after surgery. At the same time, complications and quality of life were observed till 6 months after the surgery.
RESULTS:There were no definitely differences in the perioperative data between the 2 groups. It is worth mentioning that robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy was superior in strict operative time. With a follow-up of 6 months, the study group's anatomic repair rate was 100% (20/20), while the control group was 95% (19/20). Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-short Form 20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-short Form 7 (PFIQ-7) were used to evaluate patients' quality of life. There was no significant difference in the scores between the study group and the control group before and 6 months after surgery. Only the data of the PFDI-20 questionnaires at 1 month after operation were statistically significant, and in the control group was larger than that in the study group, showing that robotic surgery can recover faster than laparoscopy, and the quality of life can be improved quickly.
CONCLUSIONS:Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe and reliable technique, faster than laparoscopy in recovery and has a short-term effect.
