Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among older adults in an Asian country.
- Author:
Mythily SUBRAMANIAM
1
;
Edimansyah ABDIN
1
;
Janhavi A VAINGANKAR
1
;
Vathsala SAGAYADEVAN
1
;
Shazana SHAHWAN
1
;
Louisa PICCO
1
;
Siow Ann CHONG
1
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Singapore; WHODAS 2.0; disability; multiethnic; older adults
- From:Singapore medical journal 2020;61(5):246-253
- CountrySingapore
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
INTRODUCTION:As populations age globally and the burden of chronic illnesses increases, valid measures of disability are needed for assessment in the older adult population. The aim of the current analysis was to explore the psychometric properties and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in an epidemiological survey of older adults in Singapore.
METHODS:The study comprised secondary data analysis of the Well-being of the Singapore Elderly study. Inclusion criteria for the study were Singapore residents (Singapore citizens and permanent residents) aged 60 years and above. The 12-item interviewer-administered version of the WHODAS 2.0 was used to assess disability in the study. Data on cognition, health status and sociodemographic information were collected. Depression was assessed using the Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer Assisted Taxonomy.
RESULTS:The study found a one-factor model solution for WHODAS 2.0 with a high internal consistency of all items. The internal consistency for the overall scale was 0.92. The WHODAS 2.0 score positively correlated with multimorbidity, perceived overall health status, depression and subsyndromal depression. There was a significant inverse association between the WHODAS 2.0 score and the cognitive status. After adjustment for all sociodemographic variables in the multiple linear regression analysis, these measures remained significantly associated with the WHODAS 2.0 score.
CONCLUSION:WHODAS 2.0 was found to be a valid measure of disability among older adults. However, further research is required to determine its usefulness as a responsive instrument that can detect change following interventions.
