"'s five-needle method" as the main treatment for allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.
10.13703/j.0255-2930.20190412-0007
- Author:
Jie ZHENG
1
,
2
;
Su-Ju SHAO
1
,
2
;
Pei-Yu WANG
1
,
2
;
Xiao-Yong QIN
3
;
Qing-Bo WANG
4
;
Xiao-Gang ZHANG
1
,
2
;
Zhong REN
5
;
Jun ZHANG
1
,
2
;
Jin-Shuang HUA
1
,
2
;
Bo-Yong SHAO
1
,
2
;
Cong-Cong ZHANG
1
,
2
Author Information
1. College of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina, Henan University of CM, Zhengzhou 450008, China
2. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Third Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM, Zhengzhou 450008.
3. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Kaifeng Hospital of TCM.
4. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM.
5. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Third Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of CM, Zhengzhou 450008.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
SHAO's five-needle method;
acupuncture therapy;
allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome;
randomized controlled trial (RCT)
- MeSH:
Acupuncture Points;
Acupuncture Therapy;
Asthma;
therapy;
Humans;
Needles;
Rhinitis, Allergic;
therapy;
Treatment Outcome
- From:
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
2020;40(5):483-487
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To compare the clinical effect differences between "'s five-needle method" and routine acupoint selection on allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome.
METHODS:A total of 210 patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome were randomly divided into an observation group (105 cases, 4 cases dropped off) and a control group (105 cases, 4 cases dropped off). The patients in the observation group were treated with "'s five-needling method", and the acupoints of Feishu (BL 13), Dazhui (GV 14), Fengmen (BL 12), Yintang (GV 29), Shangyingxiang (EX-HN 8) and Hegu (LI 4), etc. were selected; the patients in the control group was treated with routine acupuncture, and the acupoints of Feishu (BL 13), Zhongfu (LU 1), Taiyuan (LU 9), Dingchuan (EX-B 1), Danzhong (CV 17), Yintang (GV 29), Fengmen (BL 12) and Zusanli (ST 36), etc. were selected. The treatment in the two groups was given once a day, 6 times a week, for 4 weeks. The score of symptoms and signs was observed before and after treatment as well as 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after treatment. The forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and eosinophils in peripheral blood were measured before and after treatment in the two groups. After treatment, the clinical therapeutic effect was compared between the two groups.
RESULTS:The total effective rate was 98.0% (99/101) in the observation group, which was superior to 94.1% (95/101) in the control group (<0.01). Compared before treatment, the total score of symptoms and signs in the two groups was significantly decreased at 1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks of treatment (<0.01); after treatment and at each time point of follow-up, the total score of symptoms and signs in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (<0.01). Compared with 4 weeks of treatment, the total score of symptoms and signs at each time point of follow-up was not statistically different in the observation group (>0.05), and the total score of symptoms and signs in the third month of follow-up in the control group was significantly increased (<0.05). After treatment, FEV1 and PEF in the two groups were increased (<0.01), eosinophil count in peripheral blood was decreased (<0.01), and the improvement in the observation group was greater than that in the control group (<0.01, <0.05).
CONCLUSION:"'s five-needle method" can improve the clinical symptoms and pulmonary function, reduce the count of eosinophils in peripheral blood in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma syndrome, and the curative effect is better than routine acupuncture.
