UV protection for young athletes: using participatory program planning to develop a sports schools program.
10.1186/s12199-020-00872-7
- Author:
Friederike STÖLZEL
1
;
Michaela WOLFF
2
;
Vera FIEBER
2
;
Melanie GLAUSCH
2
;
Claudia WACHS
2
;
Eckhard BREITBART
3
;
Martin BORNHÄUSER
2
;
Nadja SEIDEL
2
Author Information
1. University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany. friederike.stoelzel@ukdd.de.
2. University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
3. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Dermatologische Prävention (ADP), Hamburg, Germany.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Setting intervention;
Skin cancer prevention;
Targeted intervention;
UV protection;
Young athletes
- MeSH:
Adolescent;
Athletes;
Female;
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice;
Humans;
Male;
Melanoma;
prevention & control;
Program Development;
Schools;
Skin Neoplasms;
prevention & control;
Sports;
Ultraviolet Rays
- From:Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine
2020;25(1):39-39
- CountryJapan
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND:The incidence of melanoma increased rapidly throughout the last decades, with overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation being an established risk factor. Due to their intensive sun exposure, many student athletes (SAs) have an increased risk for skin cancer. The Clever in Sun and Shade Program (CSSP) aims at enforcing positive attitudes toward UV protection (UVP) and at supporting sports schools in establishing UVP strategies.
METHODS:CSSP was developed in 2019 using participatory program planning (PPP) as well as following WHO recommendations for UVP at schools. After drafting first material, within a PPP groups were conducted at a partner school (convenience sample 1) with students (n = 20), teachers (n = 5), school administration (n = 2), and coaches (n = 5). Materials were then adapted. Program acceptance and feasibility were tested at two further schools (convenience sample 2) with PPP groups of students (n = 95) and school administration (n = 2). Content analyses and descriptive statistics were conducted.
RESULTS:Less than 50% of SAs and coaches of sample 1 expressed positive attitudes toward UVP, less than 10% reported appropriate UVP behavior. By using PPP, program material was adapted to the target groups' needs, i.e., by including specific barriers and solutions. Only the most accepted video drafts were produced. The majority of SAs of sample 2 (80-86%) used predominantly positive adjectives such as "important" and "positive" to describe the completed videos and the behavior self-check poster.
CONCLUSIONS:PPP process has greatly influenced concept and materials of CSSP for sports schools. Integration of future program participants has proven to be an important component in creating a fitting and feasible program. CSSP for sports schools is a program free of charge that enables sports schools to integrate UVP into their daily routine. It will be disseminated in cooperation with German Olympic Sports Confederation and German Cancer Aid in 2021.
