Relationship between adherence to WHO “24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years” and motor skills or cognitive function in preschool children: SUNRISE pilot study
- VernacularTitle:幼児のWHO“24-hour movement guidelines”の充足と運動機能・認知機能との関係:SUNRISE pilot study
- Author:
Chiaki TANAKA
1
;
Shinpei OKADA
2
;
Minoru TAKAKURA
3
;
Keiji HASIMOTO
4
;
Hidetoshi MEZAWA
4
;
Daisuke ANDO
5
;
Shigeho TANAKA
6
;
Anthony D OKELY
7
Author Information
- Keywords: guideline; young children; physical activity; motor skills; cognitive function
- From:Japanese Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine 2020;69(4):327-333
- CountryJapan
- Language:Japanese
- Abstract: This study examined the relationship between meeting the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years and motor skills and cognitive function in preschool children. Participants were 4-year-old boys and girls in urban and rural areas (n=69). Physical activity was measured using a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph GT3X). Screen time and sleep duration were assessed via self-report by guardians. Meeting the 24-h movement guidelines was defined as: 10 to 13 h/night and nap of sleep, ≤1 h/day of sedentary screen time, and at least 180 min/day more than 1.5 METs. Motor skills were evaluated by the Ages & Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition (ASQ-3). Executive functions (shifting, visual-spatial working memory and inhibition) were evaluated by the Early Years Toolbox (Japanese translation). The prevalence of children meeting all three recommendations was 7.2% and 7.2% met none of the three recommendations. Children meeting physical activity recommendation had a better inhibition score compared to children meeting none of the recommendation (p=0.005). While, children not meeting the sleep recommendation had a better inhibition score compared to children meeting of the recommendation (p=0.042). In conclusion, meeting the physical activity or sleep recommendations were positively or negatively associated with the inhibition score. On the other hand, meeting none of the sedentary behaviour and the 3 recommendations was not associated with motor skills or cognitive function.