Establishment of an evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability
- VernacularTitle:胸腔镜的临床功能及适用性评价体系构建研究
- Author:
Zihao WANG
1
;
Fuqiang WANG
1
;
Hanlu ZHANG
1
;
Yu ZHENG
1
;
Yun WANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P.R.China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Thoracoscope;
Delphi method;
evaluation;
reliability;
validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2020;27(08):893-899
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective By establishing a set of evaluation system for thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability, to evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of different brands of thoracoscopes, and to provide some suggestions for the innovation and upgrade of thoracoscopes, especially for the domestic thoracoscopes. Methods The project coordination team initially formulated the evaluation index system for the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscope by querying literature and brainstorming. The Delphi expert consultation method was used to distribute questionnaires to the selected experts. Experts provided scores which were based on the importance of each indicator, and clarified the basis of their judgment and the familiarity with the evaluation indicators. After two rounds of screening by Delphi method, a thoracoscopic clinical function and applicability satisfactory questionnaire was formed. The appropriate sample for pre-investigation was selected, and the reliability and validity were tested. The index composition was adjusted based on the results of the test to form a final evaluation scale. Results The project coordination team initially formulated 24 thoracoscope-related evaluation indicators. After two rounds of experts consultation, the item "brightness adjustment" was deleted without any additional entries. The positive coefficients of the experts in the first round and the second round were 100.0% and 80.0%, respectively. The two rounds of authoritative coefficients were 0.86 and 0.90, and the coordination coefficients were 0.272 (P<0.001) and 0.523 (P<0.001), respectively. A total of 140 questionnaires were issued in this pre-investigation. The recovery rate was 100.0% and the effective rate was 90.0%. The Cronbach's α value of the scale was 0.936, and the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability coefficient was 0.972. The factor analysis finally extracted 3 common factors. The total variance of the cumulative interpretation was 70.9%. The three common factors were named "operation related", "image related" and "device related". Conclusion The evaluation index system developed in this study has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to evaluate the clinical function and applicability of thoracoscopes.
