The Feasibility and Future Prospects of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gastric Cancer: Consensus Comments from the National Evidence-based Collaborating Agency Round-Table Conference.
10.4332/KJHPA.2015.25.2.67
- Author:
Eunhee SHIN
1
;
Jieun CHOI
;
Seongwoo SEO
;
Seonheui LEE
Author Information
1. Center for Evidence-based Healthcare Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
Robotic surgery;
Stomach neoplasms;
Round-table conference
- MeSH:
Adenosine-5'-(N-ethylcarboxamide);
Administrative Personnel;
Consensus*;
Health Policy;
Humans;
Insurance Coverage;
Korea;
Laparoscopy;
Quality of Life;
Stomach Neoplasms*
- From:Health Policy and Management
2015;25(2):67-70
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
To establish an appropriate policy for robotic surgery in Korea, the National Evidence-based Collaborating Agency (NECA) and the Korean Society of Health Policy and Administration held a round-table conference (RTC) to gather opinions through a comprehensive discussion of scientific information in gastric cancer. The NECA RTC is a public discussion forum wherein experts from diverse fields and members of the lay public conduct in-depth discussions on a selected social issue in the health and medical field. For this study, representatives from the medical field, patient groups, industry, the press, and policy makers participated in a discussion focused on the medical and scientific evidence for the use of robotic surgery in gastric cancer. According to the RTC results, robotic surgery showed more favorable results in safety and efficacy than open surgery and it is similar to laparoscopy. When the cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery and laparoscopy is compared, robotic surgery costs are higher but there was no difference between the two of them in terms of effectiveness (pain, quality of life, complications, etc.). In order to resolve the high cost issue of the robotic surgery, a proper policy should be implemented to facilitate the development of a cost-effective model of the robotic surgery equipment. The higher cost of robotic surgery require more evidence of its safety and efficacy as well as the cost-effectiveness issues of this method. Discussions on the national insurance coverage of robotic surgery seems to be necessary in the near future.
