Hospital survey on patient safety culture in Sarawak General Hospital: A cross sectional study
- Author:
Alex Kim Ren Jye
1
,
2
;
Chin Zin Hing
3
,
4
;
Sharlyn Peter
1
,
2
;
Priscilla Bartholomew
1
,
2
;
Josephine Senok
1
,
2
Author Information
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords: Patient safety; Patient safety culture; Hospital; Error Reporting; Sarawak
- From: The Medical Journal of Malaysia 2019;74(5):385-388
- CountryMalaysia
- Language:English
- Abstract: Introduction: Patient safety is defined as ‘the prevention of harm caused by errors of commission and omission’. Patient safety culture is one of the important determining factor in safety and quality in healthcare. The purpose of this study is to assess the views and perceptions of health care professionals about patient safety culture in Sarawak General Hospital (SGH). General Hospital (SGH). Methods: A cross-sectional study, using the ‘Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC)’ questionnaire was carried out in 2018 in SGH. Random sampling was used to select a wide range of staff in SGH. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 500 hospital staff consisting of doctors, nurses, pharmacist and other clinical and non-clinical staff, conducted from March to April 2018. A total of 407 respondents successfully completed the questionnaire. Therefore, the final response rate for the survey was 81.4%. This study used SPSS 22.0 for Windows and Hospital Data Entry and Analysis Tool that works with Microsoft Excel developed by United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to perform statistical analysis on the survey data. Results: Majority of the respondents graded the overall patient safety as acceptable (63.1%) while only 3.4% graded as excellent. The overall patient safety score was 50.1% and most of the scores related to dimensions were lower than the benchmark scores (64.8%). Generally, the mean positive response rate for all the dimensions were lower than composite data of AHRQ, except for “Organizational Learning – Continuous Improvement”, which is also the highest positive response rate (80%), higher than AHRQ data (73%). The result showed that SGH has a good opportunity to improve over time as it gains experience and accumulates knowledge. On the other hand, the lowest percentage of positive responses was “Non-punitive response to error” (18%), meaning that most of the staff perceived that they will be punished for medical error.
