Application of long non-coding RNA LincROR in the screening of ovarian cancer
10.13602/j.cnki.jcls.2019.08.11
- VernacularTitle:长链非编码RNA LincROR在卵巢癌筛查中的应用
- Author:
Jingyun ZHANG
1
;
Ting YUAN
1
;
Yujuan LI
1
;
Jing ZHOU
1
;
Jingyan XIE
1
;
Shuli ZHAO
2
,
3
Author Information
1. Department of Gynecology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
2. Department of Gynecology &
3. Central Laboratory, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
ovarian cancer;
LincROR;
screening;
gynecological tumor marker
- From:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science
2019;37(8):608-611
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the expression levels of long non-coding RNA LincROR in plasma and tissues of ovarian cancer patients and its value in the screening of ovarian cancer.
Methods:The plasma samples from 30 healthy women, 56 cases of ovarian cysts, 23 cases of endometriosis, 38 cases of endometrial carcinoma, 35 cases of cervical cancer, 42 cases of ovarian cancer, 21 cases of ovarian cancer after operation and 26 cases of ovarian cancer after chemotherapy were collected, and the expression levels of LincROR in these samples were detected by quantitative PCR. The diagnostic value of LincROR in common clinical gynecological diseases was evaluated combined with clinical data.
Results:The expression levels of LincROR in plasma of ovarian cancer patients (2.90± 4.42 ) were significantly higher than that in healthy women (0.23±0.28) and the patients with benign ovarian cysts (0.62±0.55, P ＜ 0.01 ). The results of ROC curve analysis showed that the diagnostic value of plasma LincROR in the screening of breast cancer was better than that of CA125, CA199, CA153, AFP and CEA. The sensitivity and specificity of combined screening of LincROR and CA125 for ovarian cancer were 89.7% and 86.7%, respectively (AUCROC=0.918, 95% CI :0.817-0.973). In addition, the expression levels of plasma LincROR in the postoperative patients were significantly lower than that in the ovarian cancer patients without any treatment (0.50±1.72 vs 2.90±4.42, P ＜0.01). The ROC curve analysis showed that plasma LincROR was more sensitive than CA125 in evaluating the efficacy of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer (AUCROC: 0.866 vs 0.738).
Conclusion:LincROR is expected to be an ideal biomarker for the screening of ovarian cancer, and has potential clinical value in evaluating the efficacy of chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Combination of LincROR with CA125 may improve the sensitivity and specificity of the screening of ovarian cancer
