Effect of tympanoplasty on wet ear with different mucosal status of tympanic cavity
10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2020.02.002
- Author:
Yu HAN
1
;
Changming ZHANG
1
;
Yani FENG
1
;
Xiaogang AN
1
;
Junbo JIANG
1
;
Yang CHEN
1
;
Dingjun ZHA
1
;
Jianhua QIU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology，Xijing Hospital，Air Force Medical University，Xi'an，710032，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
wet ear;
otitis media, suppurative;
tympanoplasty;
tympanic membrane perforation
- From:
Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2020;34(2):100-105
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:A retrospective analysis of audiologic outcome and graft take rate on post-tympanoplasty with different middle ear mucosal conditions in wet ear.
Method:According to the characteristics of middle ear mucosal condition and residual eardrum, 80 cases with wet ear of chronic suppurative otitis media were divided into the hydrocele group, the swelling group and the granulation group. The factors in different groups, including gender, age, disease course, sides, size and location of perforations, destruction of ossicular chain and reconstruction methods were analyzed. Moreover, postoperative hearing improvement and graft take rate were compared among the three groups.
Result:There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease course, sides, size and location of perforations among the hydrocele group, the swelling group and the granulation group （P>0.05）. Overall, the postoperative average Air-Bone Gaps（ABG） were reduced in all wet ear patients after surgery （P<0.01）. The ABG was decreased from （25.5 ± 10.8） dB to（15.4 ± 9.4） dB in the hydrocele group, and decreased from （27.6 ± 8.7） dB to （15.2 ± 9.6） dB in the swelling group, and from （29.5 ± 7.7） dB to （17.2 ± 17.2） dB in the granulation group. The graft take rates were 90.0% in totally. There were no significant difference in graft take rates among the three groups, and 84.6% in the hydrocele group, 93.3% in the swelling group and 100.0% in the swelling group（P>0.05）.
Conclusion:Wet ear is not an absolute contraindication of tympanoplasty for chronic suppurative otitis media. Whether there was effusion, swelling or granulomatous hyperplasia in the tympanoplasty, the patients'hearing improved significantly after tympanoplasty, and the healing rate of the tympanoplasty did not decrease. Further basic and clinical studies are needed to standardize the timing of wet ear surgery, clarify the operative contraindication and elucidate the pathophysiological mechanism of eardrum healing.
