Surface roughness and microleakage of class V composite restorations : Effect of surface sealing.
10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.1.022
- Author:
Min Jeong KIM
1
;
Mi Jeong LEE
;
Mi Kyung YU
;
Soo Joung PARK
;
Kwang Won LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University, Korea. lkw@moak.chonbuk.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Surface sealing;
Microleakage;
Surface roughness;
Toothbrush abrasion test
- MeSH:
Adhesives;
Bicuspid;
Dental Enamel;
Humans;
Methylene Blue;
Tooth;
Toothbrushing;
Water
- From:Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry
2005;30(1):22-30
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of surface sealing materials on microleakage and surface roughness in Class V composite restorations. Twenty five standardized Class V cavity preparations were made on the facial surface of human premolars and were randomly assigned to 5 groups. The teeth were restored with Z-250 after applying Single Bond. Following 7 days storage in distilled water at 37degrees C, the restorations were sealed as following systems : No sealing ; Single Bond Adhesive ; Biscover ; Fortify ; Optiguard. Then, toothbrush abrasion test was conducted using a wear testing machine. Surface roughness was measured by means of profilometer before and after toothbrushing and the results were statistically analysed by using a paired t-test and ANOVA. The bonded interfaces and the changes of surface roughness were examined by SEM. For microleakage test, specimens were stained in a 2% methylene blue solution, then longitudinally sectioned and analyzed for leakage at occlusal and cervical interfaces using stereomicroscope. The results were statistically analysed by using a Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test. Surface roughness was increasing in all groups after toothbrushing, but no statistically significant differences. In SEM observation, surface sealant was partially retained and partially detached in bonded interfaces. Especially, microgap was identified in cervical margins. In microleakage test, there was better seal in the enamel region and a significant difference between groups at occlusal margin. Control group and Single Bond group had significantly better marginal seal at enamel margin than cervical margin.
