Improvement of the Dose Calculation Accuracy Using MVCBCT Image Processing.
- Author:
Min Joo KIM
1
;
Woong CHO
;
Young Nam KANG
;
Tae Suk SUH
Author Information
1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. suhsanta@catholic.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Dose calculation;
Megavoltage Cone-beam CT;
Adaptive radiation therapy
- MeSH:
Calibration;
Cheese;
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography;
Electrons;
Head;
Lung;
Neck;
Noise;
Orientation
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Physics
2012;23(1):62-69
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The dose re-calculation process using Megavoltage cone-beam CT images is inevitable process to perform the Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART). The purpose of this study is to improve dose re-calculation accuracy using MVCBCT images by applying intensity calibration method and three dimensional rigid body transform and filtering process. The three dimensional rigid body transform and Gaussian smoothing filtering process to MVCBCT Rando phantom images was applied to reduce image orientation error and the noise of the MVCBCT images. Then, to obtain the predefined modification level for intensity calibration, the cheese phantom images from kilo-voltage CT (kV CT), MVCBCT was acquired. From these cheese phantom images, the calibration table for MVCBCT images was defined from the relationship between Hounsfield Units (HUs) of kV CT and MVCBCT images at the same electron density plugs. The intensity of MVCBCT images from Rando phantom was calibrated using the predefined modification level as discussed above to have the intensity of the kV CT images to make the two images have the same intensity range as if they were obtained from the same modality. Finally, the dose calculation using kV CT, MVCBCT with/without intensity calibration was applied using radiation treatment planning system. As a result, the percentage difference of dose distributions between dose calculation based on kVCT and MVCBCT with intensity calibration was reduced comparing to the percentage difference of dose distribution between dose calculation based on kVCT and MVCBCT without intensity calibration. For head and neck, lung images, the percentage difference between kV CT and non-calibrated MVCBCT images was 1.08%, 2.44%, respectively. In summary, our method has quantitatively improved the accuracy of dose calculation and could be a useful solution to enhance the dose calculation accuracy using MVCBCT images.
