Psychological influence of mini-invasive Carisolv III gel for caries removal in primary teeth
10.16571/j.cnki.1008-8199.2019.02.011
- VernacularTitle: 伢典Ⅲ凝胶微创去腐治疗乳牙龋齿对患儿心理影响
- Author:
Min YAO
1
;
Ai-xiu GONG
1
;
Shu ZHOU
1
;
Liang-yuan LIN
1
;
Hao-ran MA
1
;
Fen MIAO
1
;
Zi-han LIU
1
;
Gen-xiong TANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Stomatology,Affiliated Children′s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu ,China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Carisolv III gel;
mechanical method;
primary dental caries
- From:
Journal of Medical Postgraduates
2019;32(2):167-170
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Mini-invasive Carisolv is an aid to treat dental caries for patients with dental phobia. The article was to investigate the level of pain in caries removal using mini-invasive Carisolv III gel and mechanical methods with four psychological indicators. Methods We collected 120 primary molar tooth caries of 60 children treated in our hospital. Two primary molar tooth caries of each child were respectively treated with Carisolv III gel (Group A) and mechanical method (Group B) for caries removal. Psychological indicators including the visual analog scale (VAS), the Frank1 behavior rating scale (Frank1), the Kuttner law (Kuttner), and the Houpt behavior rating scale (Houpt) were used to assess the level of pain, degree of cooperation, pain tolerance and comfort. The clinical efficiency after six months and treatment time were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistically significant difference before treatment between the two groups using the four psychological indicators (P>0.05) , while significant differences were found during and after the treatment between the two groups (P<0.05). Then, Carisolv III gel and mechanical groups for careis removal were compared before, during and after treatment themselves. In the Carisolv III gel group, there was no statistically significant difference using the four psychological indicators (P>0.05). In the mechanical group, there were statistically significant differences before and during treatment or before and after treatment using the four psychological indicators (P<0.05). The treatment time in Carisolv III gel group was longer than in mechanical group (P=0.001). There was no statistical difference between the two groups in filling examination after six months (P=0.082). Conclusion Carisolv III gel for caries removal can effectively avoid pain, improve comfort and decrease fear in children, which can be promoted in clinical application.
