Investigation and Analysis of the Channels for Doctors to Obtain Diagnosis and Treatment Information about Diseases in Tangshan
- VernacularTitle:唐山市临床医师获得疾病诊疗相关信息渠道的调查分析
- Author:
Hai SONG
1
;
Meizhu FENG
1
;
Wenzhe ZHAO
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Science and Education，Tangshan People’s Hospital，Hebei Tangshan 063001，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Tangshan;
Doctors;
Diagnosis and treatment information about diseases;
Channels;
Investigation and analysis
- From:
China Pharmacy
2019;30(13):1854-1858
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE： To investigate and analyze the channels by which doctors obtain related information of diagnosis and treatment about diseases， and to provide reference for management institutions to understand related information and execute continue education. METHODS： 14 public general hospitals （12 were second grade class A， 2 were third grade class A） with grade Ⅱ and above in Tangshan were selected， and a self-designed questionnaire was used to conduct a one-to-one paper questionnaire survey on the doctors on duty. The content of the survey focused on the channels to obtain related information of diagnosis and treatment （including internal communication platform for medical experts， professional Chinese medical journals， professional medical network media， professional medical training classes/courses and professional medical academic conferences）. The channels to access relevant information on diagnosis and treatment were analyzed from the hospital level， department， professional title， education backgrounds and medical years. RESULTS： A total of 2 536 questionnaires were sent out， and 2 105 questionnaires were recovered （recovery rate of 83.0％）， among which there were 2 047 valid questionnaires （effective rate of 97.2％）. Doctors in third grade hospitals obtain more relevant information through “professional Chinese medical journals” “professional medical network media” “professional medical training classes/courses” “professional medical academic conferences” and than doctors in second grade hospitals （P＜0.05 or P＜0.01）； there was no statistical significance among different departments （P＞0.05）. Doctors with deputy chief physician or above title chose “internal communication platform for medical experts” “professional Chinese medical journals” and “professional medical academic conference” more than doctors with attending physician or below title （P＜0.05 or P＜0.01）. The proportion of doctors with master’s degree or above choosing “professional Chinese medical journals” “professional medical network media” and “professional medical academic conferences” were significantly higher than that of doctors with bachelor’s degree or below （P＜0.05 or P＜0.01）. The proportion of doctors who had been in medicine experience for 11 years or more choosing “professional Chinese medical journals” and “professional medical training classes/courses” were higher than that of doctors who had been in medicine experience for 10 years or less （P＜0.05 or P＜0.01）. Overall， the doctors who choosing “internal communication platform for medical experts” and “professional medical network media” was significantly higher than that of doctors choosing “professional Chinese medical journals” “professional medical training classes/courses” and “professional medical academic conferences” （P＜0.001）. CONCLUSIONS： Doctors are more likely to choose “internal communication platform for medical experts” and “professional medical network media” channels to obtain disease diagnosis and treatment information. Medical experts’ inner exchange platforms and professional medical network media can be effectively used as an important way for medical staff to conduct continue education and improve the level of disease diagnosis and treatment.
