Systematic Evaluation of Current Status of Charges in PIVAS of China
- VernacularTitle:我国静脉用药集中调配中心收费现状的系统评价
- Author:
Chunsong YANG
1
,
2
;
Tianyi ZHANG
3
;
Lingli ZHANG
1
,
2
;
Yunzhu LIN
1
,
2
;
Lu HAN
1
,
2
;
Yeli WANG
1
,
2
;
Shan GAO
1
,
2
;
Wenrong JING
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy/Evidence-based Pharmacy Center，West China Second University Hospital，Sichuan University，Chengdu 610041，China
2. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children，Sichuan University，Ministry of Education，Chengdu 610041，China
3. West China School of Pharmacy，Sichuan University，Chengdu 610041，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Pharmacy intravenous admixture services;
Current status of charges;
Cost estimation;
Charge standard;
Influential factors
- From:
China Pharmacy
2019;30(17):2414-2418
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate current status of charges in pharmacy intravenous admixture services （PIVAS）， and to provide reference for the formulation of China’s pharmacy intravenous admixture services （PIVAS） charging standards. METHODS： Retrieved from PubMed， Embase， Cochrane library， CBM， CNKI， VIP， Wanfang database and related goverment websets， the literatures about current status evaluation of charges in PIVAS of China were collected during the establishment of database to Jan. 2019. Cost estimation， charge standard， influential factors and other indicators were collected， and the results were presented by descriptive analysis. RESULTS： A total of 5 literatures were included， all of which were reviewed. According to the existing literatures， except for Shandong， Guangdong and Yunnan provinces， there were no regional charge standards in other provinces （districts and cities）. The cost estimation methods of PIVAS in these three provinces were basically the same. The cost could be obtained by adding up the business fees， labor fees， fees of medical instruments purchase and use， indirect fees etc. Dispensing charges in PIVAS were 3-5 yuan per piece for general drug， 5 yuan per piece for antibiotics and 8-12 yuan per piece for cancer chemotherapeutics， 20-35 yuan per piece for TPN. The charging level was mainly affected by local prices， PIVAS scale， hardware investment， management and other factors. CONCLUSIONS： There is no unified charging standard for PIVAS in most provinces （districts， cities） of China. The cost estimation methods of the hospitals from the included literatures are basically the same. It is necessary to construct national PIVAS charging standard and cost estimation method， which could provide a basis for formulating the price of medical and health services.
