Evidenced-based Evaluation of Personnel Training Mode in Pharmacy Intravenous Admixture Services in China
- VernacularTitle:我国静脉用药调配中心人员培养模式的循证评价
- Author:
Chunsong YANG
1
,
2
;
Lingli ZHANG
1
,
2
;
Yunzhu LIN
1
,
2
;
Lu HAN
1
,
2
;
Yeli WANG
1
,
2
;
Shan GAO
1
,
2
;
Wenrong JIN
1
Author Information
1. Dept. of Pharmacy/Evidence-based Pharmacy Center，West China Second Hospital，Sichuan University，Chengdu 610041，China
2. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children，Sichuan University，Ministry of Education，Chengdu 610041，China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
PIVAS;
Pharmacists;
Training mode;
Evidence- based evaluation
- From:
China Pharmacy
2019;30(5):708-711
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate the mode of personnel training in pharmacy intravenous admixture services （PIVAS） in China， and to provide reference for the comprehensive training of pharmacist in PIVAS in China. METHODS： PubMed， Embase， Cochrane Library， CBM， CJFD， VIP and Wanfang database were searched from the establishment of database to Sept. 2018. Studies which evaluated the training mode of PIVAS in China were included， and the results were presented by descriptive analysis in respects of training objects， training objectives， contents and evaluation indicators. RESULTS： A total of 5 literatures were included. The research types were 2 before-after control studies， 2 experience sharing studies and 1 review. 3 subjects were pharmacists， 1 subject was clinical pharmacists， and 1 subject was nurses. The training objectives were comprehensive quality training， clinical rational drug use level， pharmacy personnel training path and professional service ability. The specific training content of the training mode varied greatly， including professional theoretical knowledge， practical operation ability， pre-job training， professional psychological quality， professional ethics and laws and regulations， continuing education learning ability， career development planning and teaching ability. There were great differences in the evaluation indicators of training effectiveness， which were mainly reflected in team execution motivation and creativity， discoveny rate of unreasonable doctor’s advice， work efficiency， service quality， drug treatment level and satisfaction of PIVAS， etc. CONCLUSIONS： There are certain differences in the training objectives， training targets， specific contents and evaluation indicators of the PIVAS pharmacist training model in China. It is necessary to use the evidence- based method to construct the training mode for PIVAS pharmacist to provide support for clinical intravenous drug use.
