Attitudes of prostate cancer patients towards postoperative penile rehabilitation and their influencing factors.
- Author:
Heng-Chuan SU
1
,
2
;
Yi-Jun SHEN
1
,
2
;
Guo-Wen LIN
1
,
2
;
Xiao-Jian QIN
1
,
2
;
Yao ZHU
1
,
2
;
Bo DAI
1
,
2
;
Ding-Wei YE
1
,
2
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, Shanghai Cancer Center
2. Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200025, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
attitude;
influencing factor;
penile rehabilitation;
prostate cancer;
radical prostatectomy
- From:
National Journal of Andrology
2019;25(5):329-332
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the attitudes of prostate cancer (PCa) patients towards postoperative penile rehabilitation and their influencing factors.
METHODS:Seventy-nine PCa patients underwent radical prostatectomy from January through June 2017 and all received a questionnaire investigation before surgery on IIEF-5 and their attitudes towards postoperative penile rehabilitation. We analyzed the reasons for the patients' rejection of postoperative penile rehabilitation.
RESULTS:Totally 56 (71%) of the patients accepted and the other 23 (29%) refused postoperative penile rehabilitation. The factors influencing their attitudes towards penile rehabilitation mainly included age (P = 0.023), income (P = 0.040), tumor stage (P = 0.044), and preoperative sexual activity (P = 0.004). The patients who accepted penile rehabilitation had significantly higher IIEF-5 scores than those who refused it (14.75 ± 0.88 vs 8.48 ± 1.16, P = 0.000 2). During the follow-up period, only 29 (36.7%) of the patients bought the vacuum erection device but not the other 50 (63.3%). The tumor stage (P = 0.004), income (P < 0.01) and preoperative androgen-deprivation therapy (P = 0.039) significantly influenced the patients' decision on the purchase of the device. Relevant admission education achieved a 45% decrease in the number of the patients unwilling to accept penile rehabilitation for worrying about its negative effect on cancer treatment, a 25% decrease in those rejecting penile rehabilitation because of age, and a 20% decrease in those refusing it due to the tumor stage. The cost of treatment was an important reason for the patients' rejection of postoperative penile rehabilitation.
CONCLUSIONS:The tumor stage and income are the main factors influencing PCa patients' decision on postoperative penile rehabilitation. Relevant admission education and reduced cost of rehabilitation are important for popularization of postoperative penile rehabilitation in PCa patients.
