Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods
10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002
- Author:
Craig LOCKWOOD
1
;
Kelli Borgess DOS SANTOS
;
Robin PAP
Author Information
1. Implementation Science, The Joanna Briggs Institute, North Adelaide, Australia. craig.lockwood@adelaide.edu.au
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords:
evidence-based practice;
methods;
publishing/standards;
review literature as topic
- MeSH:
Comprehension;
Evidence-Based Practice;
Methods;
Practice Guidelines as Topic;
Review Literature as Topic;
Statistics as Topic
- From:Asian Nursing Research
2019;13(5):287-294
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Scoping reviews are a useful approach to synthesizing research evidence although the objectives and methods are different to that of systematic reviews, yet some confusion persists around how to plan and prepare so that a completed scoping review complies with best practice in methods and meets international standards for reporting criteria. This paper describes how to use available guidance to ensure a scoping review project meets global standards, has transparency of methods and promotes readability though the use of innovative approaches to data analysis and presentation. We address some of the common issues such as which projects are more suited to systematic reviews, how to avoid an inadequate search and/or poorly reported search strategy, poorly described methods and lack of transparency, and the issue of how to plan and present results that are clear, visually compelling and accessible to readers. Effective pre-planning, adhering to protocol and detailed consideration of how the results data will be communicated to the readership are critical. The aim of this article is to provide clarity about what is meant by conceptual clarity and how pre-planning enables review authors to produce scoping reviews which are of high quality, reliability and readily publishable.
