Construction of an appropriate technology catalogue for general practice based on Delphi method
10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2019.03.009
- VernacularTitle:应用德尔菲法构建全科适宜技术目录
- Author:
Lin SU
1
;
Jia ZHANG
;
Wenhua ZHU
;
Honglei DAI
Author Information
1. Department of General Practice,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
General medicine，Appropriate technology，Catalogue，Delphi method
- From:
Journal of Preventive Medicine
2019;31(3):255-259
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective :To construct an appropriate technology catalogue for general practice based on Delphi method,and to provide reference for promoting appropriate techniques and training general practitioners.
Methods :The catalogue was briefly constructed based on literature reviews and the data of the top twenty diseases diagnosed in out-patient department of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and two community health service centers in Hangzhou. Two-round Delphi consultation was conducted by fourteen general practitioners coming from upper first-class hospitals and community hospitals. The final catalogue was established according to evaluation of the degree of involvement,authority coefficient and Kendall's W values of the fourteen specialists.
consultations :Results Of the fourteen specialists,nine had bachelor's degrees and five had master's degrees or above;twelve were deputy chief physicians or chief physicians and two were physicians. They were engaged in general practice for 17.21 years in average. The positive coefficients of the two rounds of were both 100.00%. The authority coefficient of the specialists was 0.891. After the first round of consultation,the W values for importance and feasibility of 6 first-class indicators were 0.170 and 0.244,and the ones of 56 second-class indicators were 0.236 and 0.250（all P<0.05）. Six of second-class indicators were excluded because their coefficent of variation（CV）for importance and feasibility were more than 0.25. After the second round of consultation,the W values for importance and feasibility of 6 first-class indicators were 0.245 and 0.247,and the ones of 50 second-class indicators were 0.355 and 0.370（all P<0.05）. The CV for each indicator was less than 0.25. Finally,an instructional catalogue was defined,consisting of 6 first-class indicators（basic diagnosis and treatment skills,first aid skills,symptomatic diagnosis and treatment skills,chronic disease management skills,common disease diagnosis and treatment skills,and common manipulative skills）and 50 second-class indicators.
Conclusion :The degrees of involvement,authority and consistency of the specialists were relatively high. The catalogue of appropriate technology for general practitice had good reliability and feasibility,which was worthy of promotion and application.
- Full text:应用德尔菲法构建全科适宜技术目录.pdf
