Assessment of capacity for logisty, public education, and training in public health emergency management in China.
- Author:
Guo-qing HU
1
;
Ke-qin RAO
;
Zhen-qiu SUN
;
Ren-he YU
Author Information
1. Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
China;
Disaster Planning;
organization & administration;
Emergency Medical Services;
standards;
statistics & numerical data;
Equipment and Supplies, Hospital;
statistics & numerical data;
Female;
Humans;
Male;
Public Health;
education;
Public Health Administration;
Surveys and Questionnaires
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2008;33(10):947-951
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE:To assess the capacity for logistics, public education, and training in managing public health emergency in China at present.
METHODS:Four provinces were selected using stratified sampling. All the municipalities of these 4 provinces were assessed using the 9th and 10th subscales (logistics, public education and training) of Preparedness and response capacity questionnaire for public health emergencies for provincial or municipal governments developed by the Center for Health Statistics and Information, Ministry of Health of China.
RESULTS:Sixty of the 66 questionnaires (90.91%) were collected. Among the 60 investigated municipalities, 80% established a specific agency to take charge of emergency material storage, management and allocation, 65% developed standard for material storage, 35% developed standard of places for material storage, 25% built regulation for testing, maintaining, and updating the emergency materials regularly, 45% arranged budget for routine payment, 27% established standard of emergency fund, and 28% set up the procedure to initiate emergency fund. The average of standard score of subscale 9 was 43.33 (95% confidence interval, 35.65~51.01). 25% of the 60 municipalities conducted assessment for training in the past 2 years, 53% developed plan for emergency personnel training, 20% developed effectiveness assessment regulation of emergency personnel training, 80% assigned a specific agency to be responsible for public education, and 23% established regulation for public education. The average of standard score of subscale 10 was 47.43 (95% confidence interval, 40.69~54.17).
CONCLUSION:Serious problems are found in logistics, public education, and training for public health emergency management in China. Measures should be taken immediately by the central and local government to improve these capacities.
