Hilar Branching Anatomy of Living Adult Liver Donors: Comparison of T2-MR Cholangiography and Contrast Enhanced T1-MR Cholangiography in Terms of Diagnostic Utility .
10.3348/jkrs.2004.50.3.185
- Author:
Joon Seok LIM
;
Myeong Jin KIM
;
Kyung Sik KIM
;
Joo Hee KIM
;
Young Taik OH
;
Jin Yong KIM
;
Hyung Sik YOO
;
Jong Tae LEE
;
Ki Whang KIM
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Bile duct radiography, technology;
Bile ducts MR;
Bile ducts surgery;
Liver, transplantation
- MeSH:
Adult*;
Cholangiography*;
Consensus;
Humans;
Liver Transplantation;
Liver*;
Tissue Donors*
- From:Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
2004;50(3):185-193
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare T2-weighted MR cholangiography (T2-MRC) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRC (enhanced T1-MRC) in the assessment of biliary anatomy in donor candidates for living related liver transplantation (LRLT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three potential donors underwent MR examination for preoperative evaluation. Using the single-shot half-Fourier RARE sequence, T2-weighted single-section and coronal images were obtained, and enhanced T1-MRC was performed, using 3D GRE sequences after the administration of mangafodifir trisodium. To assess the hilar ductal branching pattern and determine diagnostic confidence, two reviewers first evaluated the unpaired T2-MRC and enhanced T1-MRC images, and then paired T2-MRC and enhanced T1-MRC images together. In particular, in 12 cases in which direct cholangiographys were performed, the feasibility of single duct-to-duct anastomosis was assessed using the unpaired and the paired sets sequentially. RESULTS: The reviewers' confidence tended to be higher for enhanced T1-MRC than T2-MRC, but the difference was not statistically significant. For both reviewers, confidence was significantly higher for the paired set than for T2- or enhanced T1-MRC alone (p < .001). The types of biliary anatomy determined in the paired set matched the consensus reading in 33 (100%) and 30 cases(91%) assessed by reviewer 1 and 2, respectively. The separate interpretation of T2- and enhanced T1-MRC findings matched the consensus interpretation in 30 (91%) and 28 cases (85%), respectively, assessed by reviewer 1, and 26 (79%) and 28 cases (85%), respectively, assessed by reviewer 2. The possibility of single anastomosis was accurately predicted in 91.6% of cases in T2-MRC, and 100% at enhanced T1-MRC and the combined set. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of the biliary anatomy of potential donors for LRLT, the combined use of T2-MRC and enhanced T1-MRC may improve diagnostic confidence and decrease the occurrence of a non diagnostic or equivocal interpretation at T2-MRC alone.
