Application of superb microvascular imaging and contrast enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.06.007
- Author:
Yongfeng ZHAO
1
;
Ping ZHOU
1
;
Hong PENG
1
;
Wengang LIU
1
;
Yan ZHANG
1
;
Xin LU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ultrasound, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Diagnosis, Differential;
Humans;
Thyroid Neoplasms;
Thyroid Nodule;
Ultrasonography
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2019;44(6):649-656
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To compare the clinical value of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, and to further study whether the combination of SMI and/or CEUS with thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS) can improve the diagnostic value of TI-RADS.
Methods: SMI, CEUS, TI-RADS, TI-RADS combined with CEUS, TI-RADS combined with SMI, TI-RADS combined with SMI and CEUS were used to differentiate thyroid nodules. TI-RADS 4b, 5 categories in two-dimensional ultrasound, hypoenhancement in CEUS, and peripheral blood flow with penetrating vessels in SMI were considered malignant signs. The diagnostic efficacy of these methods was compared according to post-operative pathology or fine needle aspiration cytology.
Results: A total of 237 patients with 296 thyroid nodules were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for TI-RADS were 78.4%, 77.7% and 78.0% respectively, 75.5%, 86.6% and 81.4% in SMI, 82.0%, 88.5% and 85.5% in CEUS, 92.1%, 90.4% and 91.2% in TI-RADS combined with SMI and CEUS. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) showed no significant difference between SMI, CEUS, TI-RADS (χ2=4.29, P=0.117). AUROC of both TI-RADS combined with CEUS (χ2=39.62, P<0.001), TI-RADS combined with SMI (χ2=36.61, P<0.001) were higher than TI-RADS. AUROC of TI-RADS combined with SMI and CEUS was higher than TI-RADS combined with SMI (χ2=4.50, P=0.033) or TI-RADS combined with CEUS (χ2=4.24, P=0.039).
Conclusion: Peripheral blood flow with penetrating vessels in SMI possesses high diagnostic value in differentiating thyroid cancer. The combination of SMI and/or CEUS with TI-RADS can be used to improve the diagnostic efficacy of TI-RADS in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.
