Law of dominant eye's transformation after cataract phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation surgery.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2018.10.010
- Author:
Su PAN
1
;
Qian TAN
1
;
Weitao SONG
1
;
Tingting SONG
1
;
Yuheng TAO
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ophthalmology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China.
- Publication Type:Clinical Trial
- MeSH:
Aged;
Aged, 80 and over;
Cataract;
therapy;
Cataract Extraction;
Humans;
Middle Aged;
Phacoemulsification;
Treatment Outcome;
Visual Acuity
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2018;43(10):1103-1111
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To study the change of the dominant eye in the age-related cataract patients before and after surgery, to analyze the correlation between the orientation of the dominant eye and the visual quality, and to observe whether the patients with the change in dominant eye were converted to dizziness.
Methods: A total of 44 patients, with age-related cataract between 60 and 80 years old were enrolled. Group A: the non-dominant (secondary) eye served as the surgical eye (n=35); Group B: the dominant eye served as the surgical eye (n=9); Group C: the operation was performed on the contralateral eye after a month (n=28). Measurement of the dominant eye was performed before operation, 1 week after operation and 1 month after the operation. The changes in the uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spherical equivalent (SE) between the dominant and non-dominant eye were compared.
Results: The UCDVA, CS, BCVA and SE were significantly improved at 1 day after the operation. There was significant difference between the 2 groups (P<0.05). Preoperative: in group A, the UCDVA, CS, BCVA of ocular dominance were better than the non-dominant eye with significant difference (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference between the SE (P>0.05); in group B, the UCDVA, CS, BCVA in the dominant eye were better than the non-dominant eye's, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). After operation: the UCDVA, CS and BCVA in the dominant eye in group A and group B were higher than those of the non-dominant eye with statistical difference (P<0.05), but there was no statistical difference between SE (P>0.05). The dominant eye's transformation occurred in group A when the non-dominant eye's postoperative visual quality improved over the leading eye. The transformation rate was 60% in 1 week, and the conversion rate was 80% in 1 month. In group C, the dominant eye reduction rate was 100%, and the visual quality was not significant difference between the two eyes (P>0.05). After the operation, the patients with the dominant eye's transformation felt discomfort, which could be relieved within 1 week.
Conclusion: The location of the dominant eye was correlated with uncorrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and the best corrected visual acuity. The dominant eye's transformation occurred when the non-dominant eye's postoperative visual quality improved over the leading eye after the surgery. If the contralateral eye's surgery was performed in a short term, the dominant eye can be returned to the initial state.
