Evaluation of the volume and function of left atrial appendage and left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2018.12.005
- Author:
Fang ZHU
1
;
Baixue ZHANG
2
;
Wenhui ZHU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Ultrasonography, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
2. Department of Ultrasonography, Zhuhai People's Hospital, Zhuhai Guangdong 519001, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
Atrial Appendage;
physiopathology;
Atrial Fibrillation;
physiopathology;
Echocardiography, Transesophageal;
Heart Atria;
physiopathology;
Humans
- From:
Journal of Central South University(Medical Sciences)
2018;43(12):1309-1314
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
To evaluate the volume and function of left atrium and left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
Methods: A total of 112 patients with atrial fibrillation were divided into two groups: a paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (ParAF) group (n=80) and a persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) group (n=32). Control group was people without atrial fibrillation (n=40). Clinical data of the participants were collected. Left atrial dimension (LAD), left atrial volume (LAV), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were measured by transthoracic echocardiography, while left atrial appendage peak emptying flow velocity (LAAeV), left atrial appendage peak filling flow velocity (LAAfV), left atrial appendage maximum volume (LAAVmax) and left atrial appendage minimum volume (LAAVmin) were measured by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Left atrial volume index (LAVI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrial appendage ejection fraction (LAAEF) were calculated.
Results: Compared with the control group, LAAEF, LAAeV and LAAfV in the ParAF group were decreased obviously, while LAD, LAV, LAVI, LAAVmax and LAAVmin in the ParAF group were increased obviously (P<0.05). Compared with the ParAF group, LAAEF, LAAeV and LAAfV in the PerAF group were also decreased obviously, and LAD, LAV, LAVI, LAAVmax and LAAVmin in the ParAF group were also increased obviously (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF between the ParAF group and the PerAF group (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Left atrium and left atrial appendage were enlarged and the function of left atrial appendage was declined in patients with AF, and the changes were more obvious in patients with PerAF compared with patients with ParAF by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
