RNA simultaneous and amplification testing versus the culture method for detecting Ureaplasma urealyticum infection.
- Author:
Qu ZHENG
1
;
Wei LIU
2
;
Guo-Wei ZHANG
3
;
Kai-Qiang LI
3
;
Ling-Ling WANG
4
;
Jing-Ping GE
5
;
Zhi-Qiang WENG
6
;
Xue-Jun SHANG
3
Author Information
1. Department of Clinical Laboratory, Chengdu Xinan Gynecological Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China.
2. Department of Urology， Baoji Peoples' Houspital， Baoji， Shanxi 721000, China.
3. Department of Andrology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University / Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
4. Department of Medical Affairs, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University / Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
5. Department of Urology, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University / Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
6. Department of Outpatients, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University / Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ureaplasma urealyticum;
culture method;
male infertility;
real-time RNA simultaneous amplification and testing;
semen
- MeSH:
Andrology;
Humans;
Infertility, Male;
microbiology;
Male;
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques;
RNA, Bacterial;
analysis;
Semen;
chemistry;
microbiology;
Semen Analysis;
Ureaplasma Infections;
diagnosis;
Ureaplasma urealyticum;
genetics;
isolation & purification
- From:
National Journal of Andrology
2017;23(8):717-721
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the value of real-time RNA simultaneous amplification and testing (SAT) in the detection of Ureaplasma urealyticum (UU) in the semen of infertile males and its clinical significance.
METHODS:We collected semen samples from 542 infertility patients and 120 normal fertile men as controls in the Andrology Clinic of Nanjing General Hospital from March to September 2015. We detected UU infection in the samples using the culture method and SAT technology, respectively.
RESULTS:All the UU positive cases (except 4 false positive cases) detected by the culture method were also shown to be positive in SAT. The UU detection rate of SAT was significantly higher than that of the culture method both in the infertility patients (54.1 vs 19.7%, P<0.05) and in the normal controls (42.5 vs 12.5%, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:SAT is a rapid and accurate method for detecting UU infection in semen samples, with a higher sensitivity and accuracy than the culture method, and it can also be used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. However, the culture method has its own advantages, such as low requirement of technical equipment, easy operation, and possibility of drug sensitivity test at the same time. Therefore, SAT and the culture method can be used alternatively according to the clinical need.
