A comparative study regarding the effect of an intraperitoneal anti-adhesive agent application in left-liver living donors.
10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.26
- Author:
Cheon Soo PARK
1
;
Shin HWANG
;
Chul Soo AHN
;
Ki Hun KIM
;
Deok Bog MOON
;
Tae Yong HA
;
Gi Won SONG
;
Dong Hwan JUNG
;
Gil Chun PARK
;
Hyung Woo PARK
;
Yo Han PARK
;
Sung Hwa KANG
;
Bo Hyun JUNG
;
Sung Gyu LEE
Author Information
1. Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. shwang@amc.seoul.kr
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
Living-donor liver transplantation;
Left hepatectomy;
Gastric stasis;
Ileus
- MeSH:
Adhesives;
Body Mass Index;
Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium;
Fasting;
Gastroparesis;
Hepatectomy;
Humans;
Hyaluronic Acid;
Ileus;
Intestinal Obstruction;
Laparotomy;
Liver;
Living Donors*;
Risk Factors;
Skin;
Sodium;
Stomach;
Tissue Donors;
Transplants
- From:Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2014;18(1):26-28
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: After left-sided hepatectomy due to a living donor, the stomach can become adhered to the hepatic cut surface. An unwanted gastric stasis can occur. For prevention of such gastric adhesion and laparotomy-associated adhesive ileus, some anti-adhesive agents have been developed for intra-abdominal application. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an intraperitoneal anti-adhesive agent application compared with a historical control group. METHODS: The study group consisted of 220 consecutive living donors who donated a left-liver graft during the time period between January 2006 and December 2011. The anti-adhesive agent which was used was composed of sodium hyaluronate and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose. The historical control group which used no anti-adhesive agent included 220 consecutive left-liver donors during the time period between January 1998 and December 2004. RESULTS: An overt gastric stasis which required fasting was observed in 5 subjects (2.3%) in the study group and in 7 subjects (3.2%) in the control group (p=0.77). An additional work-up to determine gastric stasis or prolonged ileus was performed in 17 (7.7%) and 22 (10%) donors, respectively (p=0.51). Only one donor in the control group underwent a laparotomy for an intestinal obstruction. No clinical factors such as patient age, sex, body mass index, remnant right liver proportion, shape of skin incision, and duration of surgery were significant risk factors of gastric stasis or prolonged ileus. No harmful side-effects of the anti-adhesive agent were identified. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of this study, the application of an anti-adhesive agent could not be proved as to be effective for prevention of gastric stasis and postoperative ileus. A further randomized and controlled study will be required to demonstrate the real benefits of an anti-adhesive application in left-liver living donors.
