Development and Validation of a Simple Index Based on Non-Enhanced CT and Clinical Factors for Prediction of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
- Author:
Yura AHN
1
;
Sung Cheol YUN
;
Seung Soo LEE
;
Jung Hee SON
;
Sora JO
;
Jieun BYUN
;
Yu Sub SUNG
;
Ho Sung KIM
;
Eun Sil YU
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Computed tomography; Diagnostic index
- From:Korean Journal of Radiology 2020;21(4):413-421
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: A widely applicable, non-invasive screening method for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is needed. We aimed to develop and validate an index combining computed tomography (CT) and routine clinical data for screening for NAFLD in a large cohort of adults with pathologically proven NAFLD.MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 2218 living liver donors who had undergone liver biopsy and CT within a span of 3 days. Donors were randomized 2:1 into development and test cohorts. CT(L-S) was measured by subtracting splenic attenuation from hepatic attenuation on non-enhanced CT. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of the development cohort was utilized to develop a clinical-CT index predicting pathologically proven NAFLD. The diagnostic performance was evaluated by analyzing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The cutoffs for the clinical-CT index were determined for 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity in the development cohort, and their diagnostic performance was evaluated in the test cohort.RESULTS: The clinical-CT index included CT(L-S), body mass index, and aspartate transaminase and triglyceride concentrations. In the test cohort, the clinical-CT index (AUC, 0.81) outperformed CT(L-S) (0.74; p < 0.001) and clinical indices (0.73–0.75; p < 0.001) in diagnosing NAFLD. A cutoff of ≥ 46 had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 41%, whereas a cutoff of ≥ 56.5 had a sensitivity of 57% and a specificity of 89%.CONCLUSION: The clinical-CT index is more accurate than CT(L-S) and clinical indices alone for the diagnosis of NAFLD and may be clinically useful in screening for NAFLD.
