The value of sinus computed tomography in predicting the response to oral glucocorticoids in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.03.006
- VernacularTitle: 鼻窦CT扫描嗅裂评分预测鼻息肉对口服糖皮质激素敏感性的作用
- Author:
Haiyu HONG
1
;
Yueqi SUN
2
;
Jianbo SHI
2
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519020, China
2. Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Sinusitis;
Glucocorticoids;
Tomography, spiral computed
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2019;54(3):192-197
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To study the value of olfactory cleft scores through computed tomography (CT) in predicting the oral glucocorticoids (GC) sensitivity in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.
Methods:Fourty-seven consecutive patients with CRSwNP from the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January and March of 2018 were recruited in this prospective, single-blinded study. There were 28 males and 19 females, with age ranging from 17 to 66 years old. After a course of oral prednisone (30 mg/d for 14 d), these patients were subsequently classified into objectively GC-sensitive and -insensitive subgroup according to the change in nasal polyp size score, or subjectively GC-sensitive and -insensitive subgroup according to the change in total nasal symptom score. The following parameters were compared between GC-sensitive and -insensitve subgroups: Lund-Mackay scores, olfactory cleft scores, and blood eosinophil counts and ratio. T test and χ2 test were used. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used for factor prediction and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the predictive ability of those factors.
Results:There were 53.2% (25/47) and 61.7% (29/47) of patients objectively and subjectively sensitive to GC therapy, respectively. All data conformed to normal distribution. The olfactory cleft score and the blood eosinophil counts and ratio in objectively GC-sensitive subgroup were significantly higher than those in objectively GC-insensitive subgroup (3.6±1.0 vs 2.2±1.4, (404.4±200.3)/μl vs (209.5±233.1)/μl, (5.25±2.59)% vs (3.17±3.46)%, t value was 3.98, 3.08, respectively, χ2=2.35, all P<0.05). The cleft score, the blood eosinophil counts and ratio also showed the same trend in subjectively GC-sensitive and -insensitive subgroup (3.6±1.0 vs 1.9±1.3, (401.4±213.6)/μl vs (171.1±200.2)/μl, (5.39±2.76)% vs (2.48±2.99)%, t value was 5.05, 3.68, respectively, χ2=3.40, all P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression revealed that olfactory cleft score was an independent risk factor for objective or subjective GC-sensitivity (OR=2.882, 95%CI: 1.301-6.384; OR=2.508, 95%CI: 1.248-5.039). The olfactory cleft score exhibited comparable accuracy with the blood eosinophil ratio as predictor of objective and subjective GC-sensitivity (Area under curve of olfactory cleft score was 0.775, 0.829, respectively). An olfactory cleft score of 3.5 could act as a reliable indicator for predicting the clinical response to GC therapy in CRSwNP.
Conclusion:Olfactory cleft score through CT scan has the potential value in predicting GC-sensitivity in CRSwNP patients.
