The necessity of artificial kidney seeper in the ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled study
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.05.012
- VernacularTitle: 超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中不行人工肾积水的随机对照研究
- Author:
Junjie YE
1
;
Yu YANG
;
Huijiang ZHANG
;
Yuancai ZHENG
;
Yue PAN
;
Hui XIE
Author Information
1. Department of Urology, People′s Hospital of Lishui City, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Kidney calculi;
Lithotripsy;
Hydronephrosis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
2018;56(5):386-390
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the necessity of artificial kidney seeper which made through inserting a ureteral tube in the ureter to the ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
Methods:This was a randomized prospective study. Patients who conformed to the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled at Department of Urology, Frist Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2016 to May 2017. Totally 291 patients were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups (artificial kidney seeper group and non-artificial kidney seeper group) in different kidney seeper level (5 to <10 mm, 10 to 20 mm) respectively. The artificial kidney seeper group was inserted by a ureteral cathedral, then were underwent the ultrasonography-guided PCNL in prone position. The non-artificial kidney seeper group were underwent the ultrasonography-guided PCNL in prone position directly. The t test, χ2 test, repeated measure analysis was used to data measurement, respectively.
Results:Four patients who diagnosed pyonephrosis were excluded. On the 5 to <10 mm level, fever rate (14.6% vs. 4.8%, χ2=5.07, P=0.03), operation time ((65.7±9.9)min vs. (50.3±7.4)min, t=11.47, P=0.00), cost ((18 327±903) yuan vs. (14 583±784) yuan, t=24.50, P=0.00) about artificial kidney seeper group and non-artificial kidney seeper group had statistical differences. And on the 10 to 20 mm level, fever rate (14.5% vs. 3.39%, χ2=4.53, P=0.03), operation time ((66.0±9.9)min vs. (52.4±8.9)min, t=8.30, P=0.00), cost ((16 548±537) yuan vs. (13 102±629) yuan, t=32.10, P=0.00) about artificial kidney seeper group and non-artificial kidney seeper group had statistical differences. And there were no statistical differences in the success rate of puncturing, the failures of the treatment to the stone pieces falling into the ureter and clearance rate of the stone and so on. In this study, 2 cases recovered after received transfusion and digital subtraction angiography artery embolization treatments; D-J tube was indwelled into 4 cases guiding by super smooth thread; 4 cases were finished the surgeries with the help of ureteroscopy, because the stone pieces fell into the ureter during the surgeries. And there was no patients developing septic shock, adjacent viscera injury or other serious complications.
Conclusion:For seasoned doctors, there is no necessity of regularly artificial kidney seeper for PCNL when the pre-operation seeper ranging from 5 to 20 mm.
