Values of JAZF1 gene rearrangement detected by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in diagnosis of endometrial stromal tumours
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2017.11.007
- VernacularTitle: 荧光原位杂交法检测JAZF1基因易位在子宫内膜间质肿瘤中的诊断价值
- Author:
Qianming BAI
1
;
Bin CHANG
;
Xiaoyu TU
;
Rui BI
;
Yufan CHENG
;
Dan HUANG
;
Xiaoli ZHU
;
Lijing WU
;
Xin ZHANG
;
Xiaoyan ZHOU
;
Wentao YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Sarcoma, endometrial stromal;
In situ hybridization, fluorescence;
Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction;
Translocation, genetic
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pathology
2017;46(11):769-774
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the role of JAZF1 gene rearrangement in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of endometrial stromal sarcomas by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
Methods:JAZF1 gene rearrangement was analyzed by FISH in 129 cases of ESS diagnosed from January 2008 to December 2016 including 105 cases of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), 21 cases of high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS) and 3 cases of undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Sixteen cases of the related tumours in uterus were also collected as control group. The results were compared with our previous studies of JAZF1/JJAZ1 fusion gene in ESS by RT-PCR.
Results:Detection of JAZF1 gene rearrangement by FISH was successfully analyzed in 144 cases. JAZF1 gene alteration was detected in 63 cases, all of which were LG-ESS, with an overall positivity of 60.6% (63/104), while no JAZF1 gene rearrangement was found in all other cases. JAZF1 gene rearrangement was present in LG-ESS with classic histology (69.3%, 52/75), smooth muscle differentiation (2/10), sex cord-like differentiation (4/5), fibromyxoid change (1/5), clear cell change (0/1), skeletal muscle differentiation (0/1), and schwannoma-like palisading pattern (0/1). The different components in all the cases of LG-ESS with variant histology had the clonal origin, with or without JAZF1 gene alteration. Compared to the results of JAZF1/JJAZ1 fusion gene by RT-PCR, the positive rate of JAZF1 gene rearrangement in LG-ESS by FISH (61.9%, 26/42) was significantly higher than that of RT-PCR (30.0%, 12/40; P<0.01).
Conclusions:JAZF1 gene rearrangement is present only in LG-ESS, but not in HG-ESS, UUS or other related tumours in uterus. The frequency of JAZF1 gene rearrangement varies between classic LG-ESS and different morphologic variants. It is frequently, but not consistently, present in classic LG-ESS and less often positive in variant cases. The results of JAZF1 gene alterations in LG-ESS with different morphologic variants support the contention that the endometrial stromal and their variant morphologic components have the same clonal origin. Detection of JAZF1 gene rearrangement by FISH is very useful for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of ESS.
