Comparison of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open distal pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.10.012
- VernacularTitle: 胰腺导管腺癌腹腔镜胰体尾切除术和开腹胰体尾切除术手术情况和疗效比较
- Author:
Kai XU
1
;
Junjun SU
1
;
Ming SU
1
;
Li YAN
1
;
Jian FENG
1
;
Xianlei XIN
1
;
Yongliang CHEN
1
Author Information
1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Publication Type:Clinical Trail
- Keywords:
Pancreatic neoplasms;
Carcinoma, intraductal, noninfiltrating;
Adenocarcinoma;
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy;
Open distal pancreatectomy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Oncology
2017;39(10):783-786
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare and evaluate the curative effect of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP) and traditional open distal pancreatectomy(ODP) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Methods:The clinical data of 15 patients treated by LDP and 87 contemporaneous cases treated by ODP from January 2010 to November 2015 was collected, and the curative effect and prognosis of these patients were retrospectively analyzed.
Results:The operation time of LDP group was (286.5±48.1) min, significantly longer than that of OPD group(226.6±56.8) min (P<0.05). The operative hemorrhage, postoperative exhaust time, recovery eating time, the whole and postoperative hospitalization time of LDP group were (188.7±108.9) ml, (2.2±1.3) d, (2.9±1.1) d, (13.2±10.4) d and (9.3±8.1) d, respectively, dramatically shorter than those of ODP group (625.2±982.1) ml, (4.3±1.7) d, (5.2±1.8) d, (20.7±8.7) d and (14.9±7.8) d, respectively (all of P<0.05). There were no intraoperative blood transfusion case in LDP group, however, 13 patients in ODP group received intraoperative blood transfusion, without significant difference (P=0.207). Alternatively, 6 cases occurred pancreatic fistula in LDP group, among them, 5 cases were grade A and 1 case was grade B; In ODP group, 17 cases occurred pancreatic fistula, among them 13 cases were grade A, 1 case was grade B and 3 cases were grade C, without significant differences (P=0.130). There were 2 cases of delayed gastric empty, 1 case of pulmonary infection in LDP group. In ODP group, there were 5 cases of postoperative delayed gastric empty, 3 cases of pulmonary infection and 6 cases of intra-abdominal infection, without significant differences (P>0.05). In both LDP group and ODP group, none occurred percutaneous drainage, re-admissions, second operation or perioperative death.
Conclusions:Compared to ODP, LDP is much safer and more steady in perioperative periodand operation. Patients of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma received LDP can acquire more benefit and recovery sooner, and LDP is a safe and effective operative method.
