Effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using Venus-A valve for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.10.006
- VernacularTitle: Venus-A主动脉瓣膜介入治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的效果
- Author:
Guangyuan SONG
1
;
Moyang WANG
;
Yuan WANG
;
Xianbao LIU
;
Yuan FENG
;
Xiangqing KONG
;
Yongjian WU
Author Information
1. Coronary Intervention Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Aortic valve stenosis;
Treatment outcome;
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
2017;45(10):843-847
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the effect of transcatheter aortic valve replacement(TAVR) using Venus-A valve for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Methods:In this prospective study, 101 consecutive severe aortic stenosis patients with high surgical risk(Society of Thoracic Surgeon(STS) score ≥4%) or at prohibitive surgical risk were enrolled from 5 academic cardiovascular centers in China(Fuwai hospital, the second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine, West China hospital of Sichuan university, the first affiliated hospital of Nanjing medical university, Ruijin hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong university school of medicine) from September 2012 to January 2015, and Venus-A valves were used in TAVR for these patients. The primary endpoints were death from any cause and major stroke in 1 year. The secondary endpoints included efficacy and safety of TAVR in 1 year.
Results:TAVR success rate was 97.9%(98/101), and 3 patients were transferred to receive surgical AVR. There were 85 patients using 1 Venus-A valve, and 13 patients underwent valve-in-valve implantation using 2 Venus-A valves. There were 1 case(1.0%) of stroke, 2 cases(2.0%)of acute myocardial infarction, 5 cases(5.0%) of pericardial effusion, 6 cases(5.9%) of severe vascular complication, and 2 cases(2.0%) of death after 7 days of TAVR. Meanwhile, aortic pressure gradient derived from echocardiography was significantly reduced when compared with pre-procedure level(11(8, 15) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs. 59(45, 71)mmHg, P<0.01), and there was no aortic root rupture or leaflets thrombosis. Rate of NYHA functional class ≤Ⅱ improvements were observed at 6 months follow-up when compared with pre-procedure(94.4%(84/89)vs. 21.3%(21/89), P<0.01). The primary endpoint was 7.9%(8/11), and the incidence of all cause death and stroke was 5.9%(6/101) and 2.0%(2/101) respectively at 1 year after the procedure. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that cumulative survival rate was 94.1% at 1 year after the procedure.
Conclusion:TAVR using Venus-A valve for treating patients with severe aortic stenosis is effective and safe in the early and medium term post procedure.
