Reliability and validity of warning signs checklist for screening psychological, behavioral and developmental problems of children
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.06.010
- VernacularTitle: 儿童心理行为发育问题预警征象筛查表的信度效度评估
- Author:
Xiaona HUANG
1
;
Yue ZHANG
;
Weiwei FENG
;
Huishan WANG
;
Bin CAO
;
Bo ZHANG
;
Yufeng YANG
;
Huimei WANG
;
Yi ZHENG
;
Xingming JIN
;
Meixiang JIA
;
Xiaobing ZOU
;
Chunxia ZHAO
;
Scherpbier ROBERT
;
Jin JING
Author Information
1. Section of Health and Nutrition and Water, Environment and Sanitation, United Nations Children′s Fund, Beijing 100600, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Child development;
Multiphasic screening;
Reliability;
Validity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
2017;55(6):445-450
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To evaluate the reliability and validity of warning signs checklist developed by the National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People′s Republic of China (NHFPC), so as to determine the screening effectiveness of warning signs on developmental problems of early childhood.
Method:Stratified random sampling method was used to assess the reliability and validity of checklist of warning sign and 2 110 children 0 to 6 years of age(1 513 low-risk subjects and 597 high-risk subjects) were recruited from 11 provinces of China. The reliability evaluation for the warning signs included the test-retest reliability and interrater reliability. With the use of Age and Stage Questionnaire (ASQ) and Gesell Development Diagnosis Scale (GESELL) as the criterion scales, criterion validity was assessed by determining the correlation and consistency between the screening results of warning signs and the criterion scales.
Result:In terms of the warning signs, the screening positive rates at different ages ranged from 10.8%(21/141) to 26.2%(51/137). The median (interquartile) testing time for each subject was 1(0.6) minute. Both the test-retest reliability and interrater reliability of warning signs reached 0.7 or above, indicating that the stability was good. In terms of validity assessment, there was remarkable consistency between ASQ and warning signs, with the Kappa value of 0.63. With the use of GESELL as criterion, it was determined that the sensitivity of warning signs in children with suspected developmental delay was 82.2%, and the specificity was 77.7%. The overall Youden index was 0.6.
Conclusion:The reliability and validity of warning signs checklist for screening early childhood developmental problems have met the basic requirements of psychological screening scales, with the characteristics of short testing time and easy operation. Thus, this warning signs checklist can be used for screening psychological and behavioral problems of early childhood, especially in community settings.
