Clinical analysis of different root treatment methods in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.04.005
- VernacularTitle: 急性Stanford A型主动脉夹层不同主动脉根部处理方式临床分析
- Author:
Yunxing XUE
1
;
Qing ZHOU
;
Jun PAN
;
Qiang WANG
;
Hailong CAO
;
Fudong FAN
;
Dongjin WANG
Author Information
1. Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing 210008, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Aneurysm, dissecting;
Aorta, thoracic;
Aortic valve insufficiency
- From:
Chinese Journal of Surgery
2017;55(4):260-265
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To discuss the perioperative and follow-up results of different surgical methods for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients and analyzed the results.
Methods:The clinic data of 351 acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients received surgical therapy at Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Nanjing University Medical School Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2008 to December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 272 male and 79 female patients, aging from 22 to 83 years with a mean age of (52±13) years. According to root size, aortic valve structure and the status of dissection involvement, these patients were devided into three major groups: 218 cases with root reconstruction using Dacron felts, 34 cases with root reconstruction concomitant with aortic valve resuspension repair and 99 cases in with Bentall procedure. Proper shape based on the status of dissection involvement of Dacron patch was cut and put between the middle and outerlayer of aorta, then inside the inner layerone band Dacron felt was sutured with the aorta and the new middle layer with Dacron patch as mentioned above. In some cases the prolapsed aortic valve was re-suspended to the aortic cusp. Clinical outcomes among the 3 procedures were compared by χ2 test, Fisher′s exact test, t test and analysis of variance.
Results:Cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamp, and circulatory arrest times of all the patients were (250±78), (171±70) and (31±10) minutes, respectively. The 30-day mortality was 9.2%(33/351), while no difference among the 3 procedures (9.6%, 8.8% and 9.1%). In the average follow-up time of (26.0±23.0) months (range from 0.5 to 90.0 months), survival rates were similar among the 3 procedures (77.7%, 77.4% and 77.8%). Only one patient received redo Bentall procedure because of severe aortic regurgitation and dilated aortic root (diameter of 50 mm).
Conclusions:The indication of root management of acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is based on the diameter of aortic root, structure of aortic leaflets, and the dissection involvement. For most acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients, aortic root reconstruction is a feasible and safe method.
