Free peroneal perforator cutaneoadipofascial flap containing neurovascular axis for coverage of dorsal forefoot defects
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2017.03.008
- VernacularTitle: 游离腓动脉穿支小腿后外侧皮神经营养血管筋膜皮瓣修复足背远端创面
- Author:
Xuesong CHEN
1
;
Yongqing XU
;
Li YANG
;
Liming ZHANG
;
Jinshun HE
;
Xiaojun YU
;
Zhixian MA
;
Xiaosong LI
;
Li JI
;
Xiaofeng WANG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, Kunming General Hospital of PLA, Kunming 650032, China
- Publication Type:Clinical Trail
- Keywords:
Perforator flap;
Peroneal artery fibular artery;
Fascio-cutaneous flap;
Dorsum of foot
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2017;33(3):191-195
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To report operative techniques and clinical results of free sural cutaneoadipofascial flap containing the neurovascular axis based on a dominant peroneal perforating artery (DPPA, with a caliber≥0.8 mm) and its concomitant veins for reconstruction of dorsal forefoot soft tissue defects.
Methods:The flap was applied in 32 cases with middle to large soft tissue defects in the dorsal forefoot from Aug. 2009 to Dec. 2014. DPPAs arising from the posterolateral intermuscular septum was located and assessed preoperatively with color Doppler flow image and computed tomography angiography. According to the location, size, and shape of the defects, one of these DPPAs was chosen for flap planning. The flap was harvested from the posterolateral aspect of the leg. The neighboring neurovascular axis (one or more of that of the sural nerve, the medial cutaneous nerve, the lateral cutaneous nerve of calf and the sural communicating nerve) was included to ensure vascular supply. According to skin laxity of the donor site, the width of the full harvesting part which should be able to cover the region of the recipient site where pressure and friction force were prominent while wearing shores was decided; the rest was harvested as an adipofascial flap (without skin) to get enough size. After transfer to recipient site, the flap was revascularized by anastomosing the perforating artery and its venae comitantes with appropriate recipient vessels, and reinnervated (antegrade or retrograded methods). Skin grafting was performed on the adipofascial surface of the flap primarily or secondarily. The defects in donor site of the leg was closed directly.
Results:All flaps (ranged from 7.5 cm×5.0 cm to 23.0 cm×13.0 cm) were transplanted successfully, and no vascular or donor site problems occurred. All primary skin grafts (19 cases) was partially lost, but only 2 of them need a second grafting. Adipose necrosis occurred in 4 of 13 cases receiving secondary grafting but only needed wound care before surgery. Following up for 11-26 months showed both satisfactory functional and cosmetic results without problems of shoe wearing. Flap sensibility restored at least to the degree of S3.
Conclusions:The cutaneoadipofascial flap combines the advantages of perforator, neurocutaneous axis, free and adipofascial flaps leaving only suture scar in the donor leg, and is a satisfactory method for free-style and acute coverage of dorsal forefoot defects.
