Efficacy and safety of tertiary hospital guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation model
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.03.008
- VernacularTitle: 三级医院指导下社区主导的家庭自助心脏康复模式的有效性和安全性
- Author:
Rongjing DING
1
;
Limin GAO
;
Liang CHU
;
Wenli XIE
;
Xiaorong WANG
;
Qin TANG
;
Huili WANG
;
Dayi HU
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiology, Peking University People′s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
- Publication Type:Clinical Trail
- Keywords:
Rehabilitation;
Acute coronary syndrome;
Community health services
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
2017;45(3):209-216
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the efficacy and safety of tertiary hospital guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation model.
Methods:This study was a prospective randomized controlled study, 80 patients from Beijing Electrical Power Hospital and Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital with acute coronary syndrome were included from June to December 2015 and divided into 2 groups. Patients in rehabilitation group (n=52) received tertiary hospital(Peiking University Peoples′ Hospital) guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation for 3 months, and patients in control group (n=28) received routine secondary treatment for 3 months. Following parameters including 6 minutes walk distance, score of life quality (evaluated by Short Form-12), score of anxiety (evaluated by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), score of depression (evaluated by Perceived Health Questionnaire-9), self-management competency (evaluated by questionnaire) were collected at baseline and after treatment for 3 months.
Results:Compared with control group, 6 minutes walk distance was longer in rehabilitation group((60.2±6.8) meters vs. (24.9±10.5)meters, P<0.01). The difference values between after and before intervention of life quality scores((0.14±3.90)scores vs.(-7.44±5.85)scores, P>0.05), anxiety scores((-0.16±2.12 ) scores vs.(0.70±1.13)scores, P>0.05) and depression scores((-1.17±2.79) scores vs.(0.60±0.36)scores, P>0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The amplification of patients with regular exercise (50.26% vs. 0, P<0.05), limit sugary foods usually and always (53.22% vs. 3.98%, P<0.05), eat 200-400 g fruits usually and always (78.61 % vs. 0, P<0.05), eat 300-500 g vegetables usually and always (9.74% vs. 0, P<0.05), and answering very confident to questions such as let the physicians know about your diseases (40.17% vs. 5.00%, P<0.05), know how to take medicines (44.52% vs. 5.00%, P<0.05), know how much exercise was right for yourself (26.43% vs.0, P<0.05) were significantly higher in rehabilitation group than in control group. There were no cardiac rehabilitation training related cardiovascular events.
Conclusion:Tertiary hospital guided and community-driven family self-help cardiac rehabilitation model is an effective and safe management model of cardiovascular disease in chronic phase, and it is necessary to further expand the study population to verify the efficacy of this model.
