Effect of NCCN (2015) risk stratification on prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.01.010
- VernacularTitle: NCCN危险分层对异基因造血干细胞移植治疗的急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
- Author:
Yue LU
1
;
Tong WU
;
Yanli ZHAO
;
Xingyu CAO
;
Deyan LIU
;
Jianping ZHANG
;
Min XIONG
;
Jiarui ZHOU
;
Ruijuan SUN
;
Zhijie WEI
;
Hui WANG
;
Hongxing LIU
;
Tong WANG
;
Chunrong TONG
;
Shuquan JI
;
Daopei LU
Author Information
1. Bone Marrow Transplantation, Hebei Yanda Lu Daopei Hospital, Langfang 065201, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
National comprehensive cancer network;
Risk assessment;
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation;
Leukemia, myeloid, acute
- From:
Chinese Journal of Hematology
2017;38(1):44-49
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To analyze the effect of NCCN (2015) risk stratification on prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) .
Methods:Retrospective analysis of 258 patients with AML in CR (186 cases in CR1, 72 cases in CR2) who underwent allogeneic HSCT in our hospital between April 2012 and March 2015 according to NCCN (2015) risk stratification. Of them, 63 cases were classified as low risk, 112 cases intermediate risk and 83 cases high risk.
Results:①With the median follow up of 18 (5-41) months, two-year disease free surviva (DFS) in 258 patients was 78.0% (95% CI 60.4%-96.6%) . Two-year DFS in AML after transplantation was 78.6% (95% CI 61.0%-96.2%) in low risk, 76.0% (95% CI 84.0%-93.6%) in intermediate risk and 80.3% (95% CI 62.7%-97.9%) (P=0.886) in high risk groups respectively. ②Univariate analysis showed that DFS has no significant difference in patient age, the median disease course before HSCT, the WBC number at the beginning of the disease, blood routine and chromosomes examination before transplantation, extramedullary disease before transplantation, disease status before transplantation, conditioning regimen, donor type, donor and recipient sex, recipient blood type, transfused MNC number, transfused CD34+ cell number and transfused CD3+ cell number. DFS was significant lower in primary AML than that in secondary AML (P=0.006) and also lower in MRD positive than that in MRD negative (P=0.003) . The accumulative relapse was significant higher in CR2 compared to that in CR1 (P=0.046) . Accumulative non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significanlyt higher in secondary AML compared to that in primary AML (P=0.004) and also higher in MRD positive compared to that in MRD negative (P=0.010) . ③Multivariate analysis showed that MRD positive was the only significant factor in DFS and NRM.
Conclusion:Allo-HSCT treatment of AML CR patients could achieve a high efficacy, which is similar between CR1 and CR2 patients. There is no significant correlation between NCCN (2015) risk stratification and the prognosis of AML patients with allo-HSCT treatment. Pre-conditioning MRD status monitored by multiparameter flow cytometry was the only impact factor on DFS and NRM in allo-HSCT for CR-AML patients.
