Efficacy and associated factors of olfactory training in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.11.004
- VernacularTitle: 嗅觉训练治疗嗅觉障碍的临床疗效和影响因素分析
- Author:
Xiaoguang YAN
1
;
Xing GAO
1
;
Zhifu SUN
1
;
Yichen GUO
1
;
Linyin YAO
1
;
Jia LIU
1
;
Wei XIAO
2
;
Qianwen LYU
1
;
Yongxiang WEI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Olfaction disorders;
Olfactory training;
Treatment outcome
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2018;53(11):815-819
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical effects and the influence factors of olfactory training in the treatment of olfactory dysfunction.
Methods:A total of 86 patients with olfactory dysfunction (49 post-infectious and 37 post-traumatic) in Beijing Anzhen Hospital during Dec 2016 to May 2017 were recruited in this prospective study. The clinical data of patients were analyzed, including gender, age, body mass index (BMI), course of disease, smoking history, drinking history, diabetes history, hypertension history, hyperlipidemia history, and anxiety visual analogue score (VAS). All patients were treated with olfactory training for 16 weeks, and all of them underwent Sniffin′ Sticks olfactory test before and after treatment, which was evaluated by composite threshold-discrimination-identification score (TDI). SPSS 23.0 software, paired t test and univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results:Eighty patients received treatment, including 46 post-infectious olfactory dysfunction and 34 post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction. After olfactory training, the total scores of TDI increased with statistically significant (18.3±8.6 vs 13.6±7.4, t=-6.158, P<0.05). The overall efficacy was 40% (32/80). The effective rate were 45.7% (21/46) in post-infectious olfactory dysfunction and 32.4% (11/34) in post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ2=1.441, P=0.230). Logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease was an influence factor in the clinical curative effect (OR=0.881, 95%CI: 0.799-0.973, P=0.012). In patients with less than a year of olfactory dysfunction, the olfactory function improved obviously with the efficiency of 50.9% (29/57).
Conclusion:Sixteen weeks of olfactory training provides a significant therapeutic effect on the post-infectious and post-traumatic olfactory dysfunction, and the olfactory training can achieve better therapeutic effects at the early stage.
