Comparing the immunogenicity and safety of sequential inoculation of sIPV followed by bOPV (Ⅰ+Ⅲ) in different dosage forms
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2018.01.009
- VernacularTitle: Sabin株脊髓灰质炎灭活疫苗与不同剂型Ⅰ+Ⅲ型脊髓灰质炎减毒活疫苗序贯接种的免疫原性和安全性比较
- Author:
Hui YE
1
;
Teng HUANG
2
;
Zhifang YING
3
;
Guoliang LI
;
Yanchun CHE
;
Zhimei ZHAO
;
Jianfeng WANG
;
Xiaolei YANG
;
Li SHI
;
Ruiju JIANG
;
Xiaochang LIU
;
Zhaojun MO
;
Changgui LI
;
Jingsi YANG
Author Information
1. Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Pekin Union Medical College, Kunming 650118, China
2. Guangxi Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Division of Vaccine Clinical Trial, Nanning 530028, China
3. National Institute for Food and Drug Control, Division of Respiratory Virus Vaccines, Beijing 100050, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Poliomyelitis;
Poliovirus vaccine, inactivated;
Dosage forms
- From:
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
2018;52(1):43-49
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the safety and immunogenicity of two different sequential schedules of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine made from Sabin strain (sIPV) followed by typeⅠ+Ⅲ bivalent oral poliovirus vaccine (bOPV) in Drug Candy (DC) form or liquid dosage form).
Methods:This randomized, blinded, single center, parallel-group controlled trial was done from September 2015 to June 2016 in Liuzhou, Guangxi province. Healthy infants aged ≥2 months were eligible for enrollment and divided into 1sIPV+2bOPV or 2sIPV+1bOPV sequential schedules. According to the bOPV dosage form each sequential schedules, the subjects again were divided into drug candy(DC) form or liquid dosage form group, being 1sIPV+bOPV (DC)/1sIPV+2bOPV(liquid)/2sIPV+1bOPV(DC)/2sIPV+1bOPV(liquid). According to 0, 28, 56 d immunization schedule, Each group were given 3 doses. We recorded adverse events during the clinical trial (399 participants who receive at least one dose). 28 days post-Dose 3, we receive a total of 350 blood samples (excluding the quitters or subjects against trial plan), using cell culture trace against polio virus neutralization test Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ neutralizing antibody (GMT), calculating the antibody positive rate.PolioⅠ,Ⅱand Ⅲ antibody titers were assessed by virus-neutralizing antibody assay and the seroconversion (4-fold increase in titer) from pre-Dose 1 to 28 days post-Dose 3 was calculated (total 350 samples) .
Results:During the vaccination, the incidence of AEs in 1sIPV+2bOPV(DC), 1sIPV+2bOPV (liquid), 2sIPV+1bOPV(DC), 2sIPV+1bOPV (liquid) group were 79%, 76%, 80% and 74% (χ2=1.23, P=0.747) , respectively. The severe AEs in groups were 6%, 5%, 6% and 4% (χ2=0.57, P=0.903) , respectively, and none was considered to be vaccination related. 28 days after 3rd vaccination, the seroconversion rates in 1sIPV+2bOPV (DC), 1sIPV+2bOPV (liquid), 2sIPV+1bOPV (DC), 2sIPV+1bOPV (liquid) group, were 99%, 100%, 99% and 99% (χ2=0.94, P=0.815) , respectively, for type Ⅰ poliovirus; and 47%, 57%, 80%, 79% (χ2=31.56, P<0.001) , respectively, for type Ⅱ; and were 100%, 99%, 100%, 99% (χ2=2.02, P=0.568) , respectively, for type Ⅲ. In each group, the GMT of antibody against poliovirus typeⅠ were 4 539.68, 6 243.43, 6 819.53 and 7 916.29 (F=25.87, P<0.001) , respectively; Type Ⅱ were 12.98, 10.54, 63.75 and 84.21 (F=8.68, P=0.034) , respectively; Type Ⅲ were 1 172.55, 1 416.03, 2 648.89 and 3 250.75 (F=14.50, P=0.002) , respectively.
Conclusion:On the same sequential schedules, there was no significant difference between the dosage forms, all of them showed good safety and immunogenicity. In the same dosage forms with different sequential schedules, the seroconversion rate was higher in 2 dose sIPV group than the 1 dose sIPV group, especially at the neutralizing antibody GMT level against polio type Ⅱ and Ⅲ after vaccination.
