Impact of different anticoagulation therapies on heparin dosage applied to atrial fibrillation patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2019.08.003
- VernacularTitle: 不同抗凝方案对心房颤动射频消融术中肝素用量影响的临床研究
- Author:
Lu YANG
1
;
Lianjun GAO
2
;
Xiaomeng YIN
2
;
Bingli GUO
1
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiovascular Examination, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116021, China
2. Department of Arrythmia, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116021, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Atrial fibrillation;
Catheter ablation;
Heparin;
Anticoagulants
- From:
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
2019;47(8):602-607
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:Differences in the activated coagulation time (ACT) during ablation and adequate heparin dosing were observed among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing AF catheter ablation receiving different anticoagulation therapies and the suitable heparin dosing during ablation among patients treated with different anticoagulation therapies was explored.
Methods:Patients who received warfarin (n=100), low-molecular-weight heparin (n=100), dabigatran etexilate (n=98, 110 mg, Bid) and rivaroxaban (n=48, 20 mg, Qd) were included. All of them underwent the first AF ablation during January 2016 to December 2017 and patients with hepatic and renal dysfunction were excluded. Initial bolus heparin (100 U/kg, intravenous) was applied to all patients. Additional heparin dosage was added according to the ACT, which was measured in 15-minute interval to maintain the ACT within 250-350 seconds until the end of ablation. Patient characteristics, ACT and complications were compared among various groups.
Results:The baseline general characteristics among patients were similar. The baseline ACTs in the dabigatran groups were significantly longer than those in the rivaroxaban group ((133±36) seconds vs. (113±22) seconds, P<0.05). The 15 min ACT in the warfarin group was longer than in the dabigatran group ((259±56) seconds vs. (243±43) seconds, P<0.05). The 15-minute ACTs were significantly longer in the warfarin ((259±56) seconds) and dabigatran ((243±43) seconds) groups compare with low-molecular-weight heparin group ((224±40) seconds) and rivaroxaban group ((226±32) seconds) (all P<0.05). The same trend was also observed in the rate of reaching ACT goal after initial-standard-dosage of heparin (warfarin (53%, 53/100), dabigatran (45%,44/98), low-molecular-weight heparin (28%,28/100), rivaroxaban (23%,11/48), P<0.05). The 1 hour ACT in the warfarin group ((254±49) seconds) was significantly longer than the other three groups (dabigatran (233±33) seconds, low-molecular-weight heparin (226±34) seconds, rivaroxaban (231±30) seconds, all P<0.01). The rate of reaching ACT goal at 1 hour were significantly higher in the warfarin group (66%,35/53) than in the dabigatran group (41%,18/44), and rivaroxaban group (27%,3/11) (all P<0.05). The total heparin required was significantly higher in rivaroxaban group than in the dabigatran and warfarin groups (all P<0.05). During the perioperative period, no patient exhibited any thromboembolic complications, and only a few minor bleeding complications was observed among patients, which was similar between the four groups (P>0.05).
Conclusion:Higher dosage of heparin is required during AF ablation to achieve the satisfactory anticoagulant intensity for AF patients under dabigatran etexilate (110 mg, Bid), low-molecular-weight heparin and rivaroxaban (20 mg, Qd) anticoagulation therapy before AF ablation.
