Management of 242 patients with middle ear cholesteatoma by otoendoscopic surgery and the postoperative effect analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.04.003
- VernacularTitle: 242例耳内镜下中耳胆脂瘤处理及术后效果分析
- Author:
Nan WU
1
;
Zhaoyan WANG
2
;
Youjun YU
3
;
Wen ZHANG
4
;
Qiong YANG
5
;
Suijun CHEN
6
;
Zhaohui HOU
1
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People′s Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China
3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, First People′s Hospital of Foshan, Foshan 528000, China
4. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People′s Hospital, Xi′an 710068, China
5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shenzhen Sixth People′s Hospital (Nanshan Hospital), Shen Zhen 518052, China
6. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Endoscopic ear surgery;
Cholesteatoma, middle ear;
Recurrence;
Residual
- From:
Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
2019;54(4):251-256
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To summarize and discuss the characteristics of endoscopic approach to manage the middle ear cholesteatoma, and to evaluate the operative safety and outcomes based on the data from the multicenter study.
Methods:The data of 242 cases diagnosed with the middle ear cholesteatoma and received operation through endoscopic approach between June 2016 and June 2017 in six tertiary hospitals in China were analyzed in this work. There were 130 males and 112 females, with the age ranging from 3 to 72 years old. We evaluated the strategy about how to manage the cholesteatoma, discussed the detailed techniques about how to remove the cholesteatoma and to improve the efficiency under endoscopic visualization. Meanwhile, the recurrence rate and residual rate of cholesteatoma as well as the complications in endoscopic approach were summarized.
Results:A total of 158 cases were operated in exclusively endoscopic transcanal approach, 72 cases operated in combined approach, and 12 cases operated majorly under microscope and minorly under endoscope. 219 cases were operated in one stage surgery, 23 cases received second look. In the second look, 3 cases were detected with residual cholesteatomas. Among them, 2 cases were found by MRI-DWI examination after the first-stage operation. With endoscopic examination after operation, 17 cases showed retracted pocket recurrence (7%,17/242). With introduction of endoscope in cholesteatoma, 153 cases were achieved canal wall-up operation (63%, 153/242). The complications in endoscopic approach included chord tympani never injury in 27 cases, skin injury of ear canal in 11 cases, tinnitus in 13 cases, vertigo in 7 cases, external ear canal stenosis in 1 case.
Conclusions:Using otoendoscope in cholesteatoma surgery would help keeping the normal structures of middle ear as much as possible, benefit to remove the hiding pathologies, help reducing residual cholesteatoma and lowering the rate of canal wall-down operation as well. This study showed good safety of otoendoscopic cholesteatoma surgery, however, strict evaluation of indication and quite good surgical techniques and skills are necessary for avoiding unexpected complication.
