Therapeutic effect of nonablative fractional 1565nm laser for striae gravidarum in abdomen
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-4598.2019.01.014
- VernacularTitle: 点阵1565nm激光不同扫描方案治疗腹部白色妊娠纹的效果观察
- Author:
Yongqiang FENG
1
;
Lyuping HUANG
;
Menghua HUO
;
Jian CHEN
;
Lin FANG
Author Information
1. Laser Aesthetic Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100144, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Striaedistensae, striaegravidarum;
fractional laser, nonablative;
scar
- From:
Chinese Journal of Plastic Surgery
2019;35(1):59-63
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the effect and safety of fractional 1565 nm laser on white striae gravidarum (SG) in abdomen and observe the influencing factors of treatment effect.
Methods:Thirty-six patients, aged 24-39 years old, were randomly divided into two groups(group A, n=16, group B, n=20): patients in group A underwent two passes of laser treatment: striae were locally scanned at moderate level energy(35 mJ/μb) with high density(300 dot/cm2), and high level energy (45 mJ/μb)with low density(150 dot/cm2)was adopted for the whole area.Group B received one pass of treatment at moderate energy with high density 35 mJ/μb, 300 dot/cm2). All patients received three laser treatments at a 6 weeks interval. Improvement of SG appearance was assessed by blinded reviewers, 3 months after the last treatment, using a percentage category scale. Meanwhile, patients satisfaction was evaluated. The impact of skin aging on laser treatment was evaluated. Patient satisfaction scores and side effects were evaluated.
Results:All patients completed the overall trial. The average improvement of scores was 1.69±0.95, which contributed to a fairly good response rate of 88.89%. The patients satisfactory and very satisfactory rate was 58.3%(21/36). There was no significant difference in improvement score between group A(1.88±0.89) and group B(1.55±1.00) (P< 0.01). The operation duration of group B was shorter than group A, (29.6±4.9)min vs.(53.7±5.5)min, P<0.05. There was a moderate negative correlation between aging and laser treatment effect (r=-0.553). The abnormal color of skin(erythema and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation) in group A lasted longer than group B, (9.17±4.03)d vs. (6.73±2.29)d, P<0.05.The pain score during treatment was tolerable, with the score of 2.61±0.76.
Conclusions:The treatment with fractional 1565 nm laser can improve the appearance of SG. It is more timesaving when the entire implicated area treated by one pass at moderate level energy with high density. Skin aging will discount the effect.
