Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2019.01.008
- VernacularTitle: 下颌四枚种植体支持的两种附着体覆盖义齿的三维有限元分析
- Author:
Mengyang JIANG
1
;
Jing WEN
;
Shanshan XU
;
Tingsong LIU
;
Huiqiang SUN
Author Information
1. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University & Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration, Jinan 250012, China Wen Jing is working on the Department of Stomatology, Wujiang District First People′s Hospital, Suzhou City, Suzhou 215200, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Finite element analysis;
Denture, overlay;
Denture precision attachment;
Dental prosthesis, implant-supported
- From:
Chinese Journal of Stomatology
2019;54(1):41-45
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the biomechanical characteristics of four-implants mandibular overdentures supported by Locator attachment or bar-clip attachment under different mechanical loads using three-dimensional finite element analysis method.
Methods:Two different models of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using Locator attachment and bar-clip attachment (hereinafter called Locator model and bar-clip model) were established. Each model was subjected to five different mechanical loading conditions: 100 N vertical loading in central incisor (vertical load of incisor), 100 N vertical loading or oblique loading in canine (vertical or oblique loads of canines), 100 N vertical or oblique loading in mandibular first molar (vertical or oblique loads of mandibular first molar). The stress distributions in implants, peri-implant bone and mucosa were recorded under the above five conditions to evaluate the effects of different attachments on the biomechanical properties of implant-supported mandibular overdentures.
Results:Regardless of loading conditions and types of attachments, the stress concentration in implants were located at the neck of implants, and the stress concentration in peri-implant bone was located in the cortical bone. The stress values in mucosa were always much smaller than those in implants and cortical bone. Regardless of loading positions (on canine or on mandibular first molar), the maximum stress at the bone interface around the implant under lateral loading was much higher than that under vertical loading. Under various loading conditions, the stress in implants and cortical bone of the Locator model (the highest von Mise stress value was respectively 79.5 and 22.3 MPa) were lower than that of bar-clip model (the highest von Mise stress value was 110.3 and 28.7 MPa respectively) while the maximum compressive stress in mucosa (0.198 MPa) in Locator model was slightly higher than that in the bar-clip model (0.137 MPa).
Conclusions:In clinical practice, the lateral force applied to the implant-retained overdenture should be minimized to avoid complications caused by pathological loads. Under the same loading condition, the stress distributions in overdenture using Locator attachment are more dispersed, which is more conducive to long-term stability of implants.
