Influence from acetabular component orientation on stress distributions of periacetabulum
- VernacularTitle:髋臼假体放置角度对髋臼周围应力分布的影响
- Author:
Yong NIE
1
;
Jun MA
1
;
Qin-sheng HU
1
;
Xiao-jun SHI
1
;
Fu-xing PEI
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Total hip arthroplasty (THA);
Acetabular reconstruction;
Anteversion angle;
Abduction angle;
Stress distribution
- From:
Journal of Medical Biomechanics
2014;29(4):E299-E305
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Abstract： Objective To study the influence from different placement angles of acetabular component on inner and outer stress distributions of periacetabulum in acetabular reconstruction of total hip arthroplasty (THA), so as to explore proper orientation for improving stability of acetabular component after THA. Methods Based on model with inhomogeneous material property assignment, nine THA models with acetabular component at different anteversion angles(15°, 20°, 25°) and abduction angles(40°, 45°, 50°) as well as one normal hip model were constructed. The maximal hip contact force in phase of single leg stance during normal gait cycle was chosen as the loading condition. In addition, according to the qualitative and quantitative principle, inner and outer stress distributions on 9 THA models were analyzed and compared with the normal hip model as control. Results When abduction angle of acetabular component was the nearest to anatomic angle (19° anteversion, 46° abduction) of acetabulum, the phenomenon of stress shielding on periacetabulum was the most obvious. When abduction angle of acetabular component was placed at 45° and anteversion angle changed from 15° to 25°, no significant influence was exerted on the whole stress distributions of THA models. Meanwhile, when anteversion angle of acetabular component was 15°, the THA model had good stability in stress distributions, and the phenomenon of stress shielding on cortical and cancellous bone was obviously improved. Conclusions For patients who have normal anatomic acetabulum and need to be treated with THA, the abduction angle of acetabular component should be placed at 45°, as that of normal acetabulum; the anteversion angle should be 5° smaller than that of normal acetabulum and between 15° and 20°.
