Validity and reliability of the Chinese Version of the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.28.012
- VernacularTitle: 中文版压力性损伤初级和二级风险评估工具的信效度检验
- Author:
Meixiu ZHUO
1
;
Jing XU
2
;
Mengxi LI
3
;
Suping BAI
4
;
Jian SUI
2
;
Min LIU
2
;
Min LI
3
Author Information
1. Department of Gynaecology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China
2. Medical College of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
3. Department of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China
4. Department of Burn, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, China
- Publication Type:Clinical Trail
- Keywords:
Pressure injury;
Risk factor;
Inpatient
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2019;35(28):2211-2215
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To translate the English version of the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T) into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity.
Methods:Firstly, PURPOSE T was translated and revised, cross-cultural debugging, and then 213 inpatients from Jiangsu University Affiliated Hospital from November 2017 to May 2018 were selected for investigation. Choosing the total item content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) and the content validity of the item level content validity index (I-CVI) to evaluate content validity, using the Chinese version of the Braden scale as the criterion to measure the validity-related validity of the Chinese version of PURPOSE T. The internal consistency reliability Cronbach α coefficient, the assessor reliability, and the test-retest reliability measure the reliability.
Results:The Chinese version of PURPOSET S-CVI was 0.967; I-CVI was 0.6-1.0, The coefficients between PURPOSET and Braden scale in mobility, activity ability, perception status, nutritional status and humidity were 0.600, 0.661, 0.699, 0.519, and 0.783. The PURPOSET and Braden scales had a correlation coefficient of 0.407 in predicting the risk of pressure injury. The Cronbach α=0.859 of the evaluation tool, the assessor reliability were 0.87 and the correlation coefficient of the 2 measurements of the test-retest reliability were 0.91.
Conclusions:The Chinese version of PURPOSET has good reliability and validity and can be used as a risk assessment tool for pressure injury in hospitalized patients in China.
