Clinical research on the quality of life and emotion symptoms in patients with permanent peripheral facial paralysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2019.19.012
- VernacularTitle: 永久性周围性面瘫患者生活质量及焦虑抑郁情绪状态的临床研究
- Author:
Juebo YU
1
;
Zexing CHENG
;
Yuanling ZHUANG
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology, the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225001, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Facial Paralysis;
Quality of life;
Depression;
Anxiety;
Psychophysiologic disorders;
Psychology, clinical;
Questionnaires;
Facial clinimetric evaluation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2019;26(19):2356-2361
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the quality of life(QoL) and emotion symptoms(anxiety symptom and depressive symptom), and its influencing factors in patients with permanent peripheral facial paralysis(PPFP).
Methods:A case-control trial was conducted to evaluate the QoL status and emotion symptoms of 79 PPFP patients(PPFP group, disease course >12 months) between January 2017 and January 2018 from the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, and 42 healthy individuals were selected as control group.The generic questionnaire medical outcomes study short-form 36 items health survey(SF-36), Chinese version of facial clinimetric evaluation(FaCE) scale, self-rating depression scale(SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) were evaluated.The correlation among SF-36, SDS, SAS and FaCE was evaluated.SPSS 21.0 software was used to analyze the data.
Results:By the assessment of SF-36, the score of vitality[(73.23±15.04)points], social function[(72.41±15.46)points], role-emotion[(72.53±15.27)points] and mental health[(73.35±14.54)points] in four dimensions of the PPFP group were lower than those of the control group [(97.56±3.76)points, (96.51±3.32)points, (97.09±2.49)points and (96.63±2.37)points](t=-10.506, -10.144, -10.505, -10.403, all P<0.001), but the scores of physical function, role-physica, bodily pain and general health in four domains of the PPFP group were similar with those of the control group (all P>0.05). By the assessment of FaCE, the total score of the PPFP group was lower than those of the control group [(48.63±17.44)points vs.(100.00±0.00)points, t=-19.281, P<0.05]. The score of SDS in the PPFP group was higher than those of the control group[(48.43±11.57)points vs.(40.63±5.39)points](t=4.174, P<0.001), but the score of SAS had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). According to the assessment of the correlation among SF-36, SDS, SAS and FaCE, the total scores of FaCE in the PPFP group was related only to SF-36 related mental health dimensions and SDS(r=-0.848~0.908, all P<0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that marital status(t=-2.442, P=0.017), occupation(t=-2.377, P=0.020), and age(t=-5.501, P=0.000) were negatively correlated with the SDS scores; with/without synkinesis(t=3.604, P= 0.042), disease course(t=4.152, P=0.000), and the level of House-Brackmann grading system(HBGS)(t=2.116, P=0.038) were positively associated with the SDS of the PPFP group.However, disease course (t=-2.616, P=0.011), HBGS(t=-6.523, P=0.000) were negatively correlated with the total scores of FaCE, and with/without synkinesis(t= 2.767, P=0.000) was positively associated with the total scores of FaCE.
Conclusion:The patients with PFPP have a poorer quality of life and experienced greater psychological distress than healthy individuals.The present study suggested that age, gender, occupation, marital status, disease course, with/without synkinesis, the sources of PPFP and the level of HBGS are associated with depression increasing and quality of life decreasing in PPFP patients.
