Optimal strategy of switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor in Chinese acute coronary syndrome patients with complicated coronary artery disease: the switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor (SHIFT-CACS) study
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000444
- Author:
Ying YAO
1
,
2
;
Ping WANG
1
,
2
;
Xiao-Zeng WANG
1
;
Xin ZHAO
1
;
Wei ZHAO
1
;
Tie-Nan ZHOU
1
;
Lei ZHANG
1
Author Information
1. Department of Cardiology, Institute of Cardiovascular Research, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning 110840, China
2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110016, China
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Clopidogrel;
Drug substitution;
Pharmacology;
Ticagrelor
- From:
Chinese Medical Journal
2019;132(19):2292-2299
- CountryChina
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Background:The dose and time point for switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor remain controversial, especially for Chinese acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with complicated coronary artery disease (CAD). Hence, the purpose of this study was to further explore the optimal dose and time point for the switching strategy to balance the increase in platelet inhibition and the decrease in adverse events in Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:From July 2017 to December 2017, the prospective, randomized, open-label study (the SwitcHIng from clopidogrel to ticagrelor study) assigned the eligible Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI (n = 102) for 90 mg of ticagrelor at 12 h (T-90 mg-12 h), 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h (T-90 mg-24h) or 180 mg ticagrelor at 24 h (T-180 mg-24 h) after the last dose of clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was the comparison of maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) values at 2 h after switching strategies among the three groups. In addition, the MPA values at baseline, 8 h and before discharge and the rates of high ontreatment platelet reactivity were evaluated, the incidences of bleeding episodes and dyspnea during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up in our study were also recorded. The MPA was measured by light transmittance aggregometry in our study. A repeatedmeasures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model and one-way ANOVA were used to compare data for the primary endpoint.
Results:The MPA values were significantly decreased in the T-180 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group (P = 0.017) and decreased numerically compared with the T-90 mg-24 h group (P = 0.072) at 2 h. In particular, the MPA values were markedly reduced in the T-90 mg-24 h group compared with the T-90 mg-12 h group at 8 h after switching treatment (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference among the three groups in all bleedings and dyspnea events.
Conclusions:The optimal treatment strategy recommended in this study for Chinese ACS patients with complicated CAD managed by PCI is 180 or 90 mg of ticagrelor at 24 h after the last dose of clopidogrel. In addition, a negative interaction was detected in this study between the overlap for clopidogrel and ticagrelor at 12 h after the last dose of clopidogrel.
Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03577652; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03577652.
